Table of Contents
Fetching ...

M1 dipole strength from projected generator coordinate method calculations in the sd-shell valence space

Stavros Bofos, Jaime Martínez-Larraz, Benjamin Bally, Thomas Duguet, Mikael Frosini, Tomás R. Rodríguez, Kamila Sieja

TL;DR

This work addresses the challenge of describing low-energy $M1$ strength and the associated low-energy enhancement (LEE) in sd-shell nuclei, where standard QRPA approaches face limitations. It adopts the projected generator coordinate method (PGCM) to restore symmetries and incorporate collective dynamics, benchmarking it against exact shell-model results in $^{24}$Mg using the USDB interaction. Two generator-coordinate sets, Set A and Set B, are explored to break time-reversal symmetry, and the PGCM reproduces $1^+$ energies, magnetic dipole moments, and $B(M1)$ strengths, including the LEE, with remarkable accuracy and efficient convergence (roughly 200 constrained states suffice for dominant contributions). The method is extended to other sd-shell nuclei, showing good agreement in overall $B(M1)$ distributions and cumulated strength, highlighting PGCM as a viable route for systematic, large-scale calculations in nuclear structure and reaction modeling.

Abstract

The low-energy enhancement observed in the deexcitation $γ$-ray strength functions, attributed to magnetic dipole (M1) radiations, has spurred theoretical efforts to improve on its description. Among the most widely used approaches are the quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) and its extensions. However, these methods often struggle to reproduce the correct behavior of the M1 strength at the lowest $γ$ energies. An alternative framework, the projected generator coordinate method (PGCM), offers significant advantages over QRPA by restoring broken symmetries and incorporating both vibrational and rotational dynamics within a unified description. Due to these features, PGCM has been proposed as a promising tool to study the low-energy M1 strength function in atomic nuclei. However, comprehensive investigations employing this method are lacking. The PGCM is presently used within the frame of sd-shell valence space calculations based on the USDB shell-model interaction to benchmark its performance against the solutions obtained via exact diagonalization. The reliability of two different sets of generator coordinates in the PGCM calculations is gauged using ${}^{24}$Mg as a test case. The ability of the PGCM to reproduce results from exact diagonalization in the sd valence space is demonstrated for $1^{+}$ states and M1 transitions. Future work will need to assess whether the proposed method can be applied systematically and extended to large-scale calculations while maintaining a reasonable computational cost.

M1 dipole strength from projected generator coordinate method calculations in the sd-shell valence space

TL;DR

This work addresses the challenge of describing low-energy strength and the associated low-energy enhancement (LEE) in sd-shell nuclei, where standard QRPA approaches face limitations. It adopts the projected generator coordinate method (PGCM) to restore symmetries and incorporate collective dynamics, benchmarking it against exact shell-model results in Mg using the USDB interaction. Two generator-coordinate sets, Set A and Set B, are explored to break time-reversal symmetry, and the PGCM reproduces energies, magnetic dipole moments, and strengths, including the LEE, with remarkable accuracy and efficient convergence (roughly 200 constrained states suffice for dominant contributions). The method is extended to other sd-shell nuclei, showing good agreement in overall distributions and cumulated strength, highlighting PGCM as a viable route for systematic, large-scale calculations in nuclear structure and reaction modeling.

Abstract

The low-energy enhancement observed in the deexcitation -ray strength functions, attributed to magnetic dipole (M1) radiations, has spurred theoretical efforts to improve on its description. Among the most widely used approaches are the quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) and its extensions. However, these methods often struggle to reproduce the correct behavior of the M1 strength at the lowest energies. An alternative framework, the projected generator coordinate method (PGCM), offers significant advantages over QRPA by restoring broken symmetries and incorporating both vibrational and rotational dynamics within a unified description. Due to these features, PGCM has been proposed as a promising tool to study the low-energy M1 strength function in atomic nuclei. However, comprehensive investigations employing this method are lacking. The PGCM is presently used within the frame of sd-shell valence space calculations based on the USDB shell-model interaction to benchmark its performance against the solutions obtained via exact diagonalization. The reliability of two different sets of generator coordinates in the PGCM calculations is gauged using Mg as a test case. The ability of the PGCM to reproduce results from exact diagonalization in the sd valence space is demonstrated for states and M1 transitions. Future work will need to assess whether the proposed method can be applied systematically and extended to large-scale calculations while maintaining a reasonable computational cost.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 11 sections, 8 equations, 9 figures, 3 tables.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: Projected energy and norm surfaces in $^{24}$Mg as a function of the isovector and isoscalar pairing amplitudes $\delta^{T=1,0}_{pn}$ based on constrained HFB states associated with Set B. Fixed constraints $\langle J^{\mathrm{is}}_{x}\rangle = 0$ (left panels) and $\langle J^{\mathrm{is}}_{x}\rangle = 5$ (right panels) are employed. Panels: (a)-(b) VAPNP energy surfaces, (c)-(d) $J^\pi_\sigma=0^{+}_1$ projected norm overlap, (e)-(f) $0^{+}_1$ projected energy, (g)-(h) $1^{+}_1$ projected norm overlap and (i)-(j) $1^{+}_1$ projected energy.
  • Figure 2: PGCM energies of the $0^{+}_{1}$ ground state and $1_{\sigma}^{+}$ excited states in $^{24}$Mg as a function of the dimension of the natural basis, relative to the exact ground-state energy. PGCM energies from Set A are represented by full lines, exact shell-model ones are indicated by blue diamonds.
  • Figure 3: The same as in Fig. \ref{['fig:pgcm_ener_nat_setA']} but for Set B.
  • Figure 4: Magnetic dipole transition probabilities, $B(M1; 1_{\sigma}^{+}\rightarrow 0^{+}_{1})$, as a function of the excitation energy $E(1^+_\sigma)$ in $^{24}$Mg. Exact diagonalization (blue bars) and PGCM calculations with Set A (red bars) using different maximum values for the cranking constraint are shown. The comparison of the excitation energies of the lowest one hundred $1_{\sigma}^{+}$ states is shown in the insets.
  • Figure 5: The same as Fig. \ref{['fig:pgcm_bm1_setA']} but for Set B (green bars).
  • ...and 4 more figures