Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Search for Light Dark Matter with 259-day data in PandaX-4T

Minzhen Zhang, Zihao Bo, Wei Chen, Xun Chen, Yunhua Chen, Chen Cheng, Xiangyi Cui, Manna Deng, Yingjie Fan, Deqing Fang, Xuanye Fu, Zhixing Gao, Yujie Ge, Lisheng Geng, Karl Giboni, Xunan Guo, Xuyuan Guo, Zichao Guo, Chencheng Han, Ke Han, Changda He, Jinrong He, Houqi Huang, Junting Huang, Yule Huang, Ruquan Hou, Xiangdong Ji, Yonglin Ju, Xiaorun Lan, Chenxiang Li, Jiafu Li, Mingchuan Li, Peiyuan Li, Shuaijie Li, Tao Li, Yangdong Li, Zhiyuan Li, Qing Lin, Jianglai Liu, Yuanchun Liu, Congcong Lu, Xiaoying Lu, Lingyin Luo, Yunyang Luo, Yugang Ma, Yajun Mao, Yue Meng, Binyu Pang, Ningchun Qi, Zhicheng Qian, Xiangxiang Ren, Dong Shan, Xiaofeng Shang, Xiyuan Shao, Guofang Shen, Manbin Shen, Wenliang Sun, Xuyan Sun, Yi Tao, Yueqiang Tian, Yuxin Tian, Anqing Wang, Guanbo Wang, Hao Wang, Haoyu Wang, Jiamin Wang, Lei Wang, Meng Wang, Qiuhong Wang, Shaobo Wang, Shibo Wang, Siguang Wang, Wei Wang, Xu Wang, Zhou Wang, Yuehuan Wei, Weihao Wu, Yuan Wu, Mengjiao Xiao, Xiang Xiao, Kaizhi Xiong, Jianqin Xu, Yifan Xu, Shunyu Yao, Binbin Yan, Xiyu Yan, Yong Yang, Peihua Ye, Chunxu Yu, Ying Yuan, Zhe Yuan, Youhui Yun, Xinning Zeng, Peng Zhang, Shibo Zhang, Siyuan Zhang, Shu Zhang, Tao Zhang, Wei Zhang, Yang Zhang, Yingxin Zhang, Yuanyuan Zhang, Li Zhao, Kangkang Zhao, Jifang Zhou, Jiaxu Zhou, Jiayi Zhou, Ning Zhou, Xiaopeng Zhou, Zhizhen Zhou, Chenhui Zhu

Abstract

We present a search for light dark matter particles through their interactions with atomic electrons and nucleons, utilizing PandaX-4T data with an effective exposure of 1.04 tonne$\cdot$year for ionization-only data and 1.20 tonne$\cdot$year for paired data. Our analysis focuses on the energy range (efficiency$>$0.01) of approximately 0.33 to 3 keV for nuclear recoils, and from 0.04 to 0.39 keV for electronic recoils. We establish the most stringent constraints on spin-independent dark matter-nucleon interactions within a mass range of 2.5 to 5.0 GeV/$c^2$, spin-dependent neutron-only interactions within 2.0 to 5.3 GeV/$c^2$, and spin-dependent proton-only interactions within 2.0 to 3.8 GeV/$c^2$. Their corresponding limits at 3\,GeV/$c^2$ are $1.1 \times 10^{-43}$, $1.6 \times 10^{-38}$, and $5.6 \times 10^{-37}$\,cm$^2$, respectively. Additionally, our results improve the upper limits on the dark matter-electron scattering cross-section by a factor of 1.5 and 9.3 for heavy and light mediator scenarios respectively within 50 MeV/$c^2$ to 10 GeV/$c^2$, compared with previous best results.

Search for Light Dark Matter with 259-day data in PandaX-4T

Abstract

We present a search for light dark matter particles through their interactions with atomic electrons and nucleons, utilizing PandaX-4T data with an effective exposure of 1.04 tonneyear for ionization-only data and 1.20 tonneyear for paired data. Our analysis focuses on the energy range (efficiency0.01) of approximately 0.33 to 3 keV for nuclear recoils, and from 0.04 to 0.39 keV for electronic recoils. We establish the most stringent constraints on spin-independent dark matter-nucleon interactions within a mass range of 2.5 to 5.0 GeV/, spin-dependent neutron-only interactions within 2.0 to 5.3 GeV/, and spin-dependent proton-only interactions within 2.0 to 3.8 GeV/. Their corresponding limits at 3\,GeV/ are , , and \,cm, respectively. Additionally, our results improve the upper limits on the dark matter-electron scattering cross-section by a factor of 1.5 and 9.3 for heavy and light mediator scenarios respectively within 50 MeV/ to 10 GeV/, compared with previous best results.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 2 equations, 4 figures, 1 table.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Top: the differential rates (in unit of events per metric ton per year per keV) of the DM scatterings off the target. The left shows the spectra for the LDM-nucleus scattering with LDM masses of 2 GeV (red) and 4 GeV (blue), assuming an LDM-nucleon cross section of 10$^{-40}$ cm$^2$. The spectra for the SI, proton-only SD, and neutron-only SD LDMs are shown in solid, dashed, and dotted lines, respectively. The right panel shows the spectra for LDM-electron scatterings with LDM masses of 50 MeV/$c^2$ (red) and 0.1 GeV (blue), assuming an LDM-electron cross section of 10$^{-37}$ cm$^2$. The solid and dashed lines represent the spectra for heavy and light mediator cases, respectively. All spectra are without efficiency applied. Middle: all components of the selection efficiency for the paired (solid) and US2 (dashed) data: green, data quality selection; blue, signal reconstruction; cyan, ROI; magenta, BDT; black, total. The gray shaded regions indicate $\pm$1$\sigma$ uncertainties. The efficiencies for the paired data are not shown in the right panel since they are not used in search of LDM-electron scattering. The efficiencies as a function of NR and ER energies are estimated based on the nominal charge yields shown in the bottom panels. Bottom: the charge (black) yields as a function of NR and ER energies are shown in the left and right panel, respectively. The solid lines show the nominal model with the shaded regions representing the $\pm$1$\sigma$ uncertainties. The black dashed lines in the right panel give the alternative yield model (P4-NEST) used in this work. The colored lines (blue, magenta, and green) give the best-fit charge yields in the LDM interpretations with different masses and model assumptions. No significant deviation from the nominal models is observed.
  • Figure 2: Top panel: US2 data and fitted (for a LDM of 4 GeV/$c^2$) $S2$ spectra in number of electrons, run0 and run1 combined. The spectrum is stacked with best-fit contributions from the cathode (green), MD (yellow), $^8$B CE$\nu$NS (magenta), and LDM (red). The black error bars give the data distributions. Middle and bottom panels: the US2 data(black dots) distribution of the $S2$ width versus $S2$ charge. Along with expected 1$\sigma$ contours of 4 GeV/$c^2$ DM-nucleon spin-independent interaction(red dashed line), 2 GeV/$c^2$ DM-electron interaction via heavy mediator(blue dashed line), and light mediator(black dashed line), ${}^8$B solar neutrino(magenta shadow), MD background(yellow shadow), and cathode background(green shadow).
  • Figure 3: The 90% CL exclusion limit(blue line) with 1$\sigma$ sensitivity(green band) on spin-independent DM-nucleon cross section(left panel), neutron-only(middle panel) and proton-only(right panel) spin-dependent DM-nucleon cross section, together with results from other work PandaX:2022xqxPandaX:2022aacXENON:2024hupXENON:2019gfnDarkSide:2018kukLUX:2016ggvPandaX-II:2018woaPICO:2019vsc.
  • Figure 4: The 90% CL exclusion limit(blue line) with 1$\sigma$ sensitivity(green band) on DM-electron cross section via heavy(top panel) and light mediator(bottom panel) using constant-W model. The aggressive results using NEST light and charge yields are also overlaid(blue dashed line), as well as results of other experiments PandaX:2022xqxXENON:2019gfnDarkSide:2022knjadari2025firstaggarwal2025probing, and cosmological predictions from DM vector-portal freeze-in and freeze-out mechanisms Essig:2015cdabhattiprolu2024dark.