Theoretical evaluation of decay mode of $ {}^{229m} \mathrm{Th} $ in solid samples
Ryotaro Masuda, Tomoya Naito, Masashi Kaneko, Hiroyuki Kazama, So Hashiba, Kosuke Misawa, Yoshitaka Kasamatsu
TL;DR
This work addresses inconsistent gamma-decay half-lives of ${}^{229m}_{\text{Th}}$ across different chemical states by linking decay channels to the electronic structure, leveraging density functional theory (DFT) and natural bond orbital (NBO) analysis. By modeling Th in ion-trap-like and crystal environments (CaF$_2$, MgF$_2$, LiSrAlF$_6$) under two placement schemes (gap and replaced) and examining $E_{ ext{IS}} = 8.4$ eV against the Th HOMO binding energies, the authors classify possible decay modes into $\gamma$-ray decay, IC, and EB for each system. They find CaF$_2$ and MgF$_2$ (replaced) favor gamma-only decay, CaF$_2$ gap can allow IC, and LiSrAlF$_6$ can exhibit EB and/or IC depending on the site, consistent with some experimental half-life trends and suggesting that crystal environment critically influences the nuclear-clock suitability. The results offer a qualitative, first-principles route to predict decay channels in solids and point to future work on quantitative IC probabilities and refined refractive-index corrections to reconcile remaining discrepancies and guide material choice for a nuclear clock.
Abstract
The excitation energy of $ {}^{229m} \mathrm{Th} $ is extremely low at $ 8.4 \, \mathrm{eV} $; thus, this isotope exhibits changes in its decay modes depending on the chemical state, specifically the outermost electronic states. However, the reported half-lives of the $ γ$-ray transition are not consistent among the previous experiments. In this study, we investigate the chemical states of $ {}^{229m} \mathrm{Th} $ by density functional theory calculations. Based on these results, we evaluate the relationship between the experimental half-life of each sample and the electronic state of $ \mathrm{Th} $. The calculation results indicate that ion trap method, $ \mathrm{Ca} \mathrm{F}_2 $ model and $ \mathrm{Mg} \mathrm{F}_2 $ one decay only via the $ γ$-ray transition, whereas $ \mathrm{Li} \mathrm{Sr} \mathrm{Al} \mathrm{F}_6 $ one decays via the $ γ$-ray transition and has a possibility of decay via internal conversion and electron bridge.
