The Integrality Gap of the Traveling Salesman Problem is $4/3$ if the LP Solution Has at Most $n+6$ Non-zero Components
Tullio Villa, Eleonora Vercesi, Janos Barta, Monaldo Mastrolilli
TL;DR
This work analyzes the integrality gap of the symmetric metric TSP under the Dantzig–Fulkerson–Johnson (DFJ) subtour-elimination relaxation by focusing on SEP vertices with limited support. It introduces the Gap-Bounding algorithm and the vertex-family framework (including ancestors $\\mathcal{A}_k$ and the sets $\\mathcal{F}_k$) to propagate gap bounds from a small, finite set of base cases to infinite families of vertices, enabling a universal bound for costs whose SEP solution lies in these families. By combining duality-based bounds with a constructive bb-move mechanism, the authors prove that the integrality gap is at most $4/3$ for all SEP vertices with at most $n+6$ non-zero components, supported by computational verification up to $k=6$ and augmented by selective successor analysis. The methodology offers a novel, hybrid theoretical-computational path for tackling the long-standing $4/3$ conjecture and may extend to broader classes of SEP vertices and related combinatorial gaps.
Abstract
We address the classical Dantzig - Fulkerson - Johnson formulation of the symmetric metric Traveling Salesman Problem and study the integrality gap of its linear relaxation, namely the Subtour Elimination Problem (SEP). This integrality gap is conjectured to be 4/3. We prove that, when solving a problem on n nodes, if the optimal SEP solution has at most n + 6 non-zero components, then the conjecture is true. To establish this result, we devise a new methodology that combines theoretical analysis and computational verification.
