Temporal Motif Participation Profiles for Analyzing Node Similarity in Temporal Networks
Maxwell C. Lee, Kevin S. Xu
TL;DR
This work addresses the challenge of identifying node similarity in temporal networks by moving beyond global motif counts to capture node-level roles in temporal motifs. It introduces Temporal Motif Participation Profiles (TMPPs), a 104-dimensional, position-aware embedding that encodes how often a node occupies each motif position across all 3-edge temporal motifs, with a 36-dimensional positionless variant for comparison. Through simulations with the MULCH model and a case study on militarized interstate disputes, the authors demonstrate that including motif positions yields significantly more accurate and interpretable clustering of nodes by role than positionless counts, enabling clearer insight into network structure and actor behavior. The TMPP framework provides a human-interpretable, unsupervised embedding that can facilitate analysis, visualization, and cross-domain application to complex time-evolving networks, with future work extending to larger motifs and scalable computation.
Abstract
Temporal networks consisting of timestamped interactions between a set of nodes provide a useful representation for analyzing complex networked systems that evolve over time. Beyond pairwise interactions between nodes, temporal motifs capture patterns of higher-order interactions such as directed triangles over short time periods. We propose temporal motif participation profiles (TMPPs) to capture the behavior of nodes in temporal motifs. Two nodes with similar TMPPs take similar positions within temporal motifs, possibly with different nodes. TMPPs serve as unsupervised embeddings for nodes in temporal networks that are directly interpretable, as each entry denotes the frequency at which a node participates in a particular position in a specific temporal motif. We demonstrate that clustering TMPPs reveals groups of nodes with similar roles in a temporal network through simulation experiments and a case study on a network of militarized interstate disputes.
