Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The Saturation Number for the Diamond is Linear

Maria-Romina Ivan, Sean Jaffe

Abstract

For a fixed poset $\mathcal P$ we say that a family $\mathcal F\subseteq\mathcal P([n])$ is $\mathcal P$-saturated if it does not contain an induced copy of $\mathcal P$, but whenever we add a new set to $\mathcal F$, we form an induced copy of $\mathcal P$. The size of the smallest such family is denoted by $\text{sat}^*(n, \mathcal P)$.\par For the diamond poset $\mathcal D_2$ (the two-dimensional Boolean lattice), while it is easy to see that the saturation number is at most $n+1$, the best known lower bound has stayed at $O(\sqrt n)$ since the introduction of the area of poset saturation. In this paper we prove that $\text{sat}^*(n, \mathcal D_2)\geq \frac{n+1}{5}$, establishing that the saturation number for the diamond is linear. The proof uses a result about certain pairs of set systems.

The Saturation Number for the Diamond is Linear

Abstract

For a fixed poset we say that a family is -saturated if it does not contain an induced copy of , but whenever we add a new set to , we form an induced copy of . The size of the smallest such family is denoted by .\par For the diamond poset (the two-dimensional Boolean lattice), while it is easy to see that the saturation number is at most , the best known lower bound has stayed at since the introduction of the area of poset saturation. In this paper we prove that , establishing that the saturation number for the diamond is linear. The proof uses a result about certain pairs of set systems.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 5 sections, 12 theorems, 12 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

$\text{sat}^*(n,\mathcal{D}_2)=\Theta(n)$.

Figures (12)

  • Figure :
  • Figure :
  • Figure :
  • Figure :
  • Figure :
  • ...and 7 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (36)

  • Theorem 1
  • Lemma 2: Lemma 5 in ferrara2017saturation
  • Lemma 3
  • proof
  • Claim 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 4
  • proof
  • Lemma 5
  • Proposition 6
  • ...and 26 more