Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quantum Spin Glass in the Two-Dimensional Disordered Heisenberg Model via Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States

Luciano Loris Viteritti, Riccardo Rende, Giacomo Bracci Testasecca, Jacopo Niedda, Roderich Moessner, Giuseppe Carleo, Antonello Scardicchio

TL;DR

The paper addresses the existence of a quantum spin-glass phase in a two-dimensional disordered Heisenberg model by employing Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States (FNQS) to efficiently compute disorder-averaged ground-state properties across many realizations, mitigating the sign problem and boundary-condition issues. It identifies an intermediate quantum spin-glass region between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases, evidenced by a finite overlap order parameter $Q$ when magnetic orders vanish, with phase boundaries near $p_{\mathrm{FM}}\approx0.2$ and $p_{\mathrm{AFM}}\approx0.8$. A complementary semiclassical Holstein-Primakoff spin-wave analysis shows that quantum fluctuations do not destroy the spin-glass order at leading order in $1/S$, with $Q_{\text{SW}}^2=Q_0^2+\Delta Q^2$ agreeing with the fully quantum FNQS results at $S=1/2$. The work demonstrates FNQS as a scalable method for disordered quantum magnets and provides a coherent 2D phase diagram, highlighting the robustness of QSG phases against quantum fluctuations and motivating future studies of low-energy excitations and potential spin-liquid regimes near phase boundaries.

Abstract

We investigate the two-dimensional frustrated quantum Heisenberg model with bond disorder on nearest-neighbor couplings using the recently introduced Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States framework, which enables accurate and efficient computation of disorder-averaged observables with a single variational optimization. Simulations on large lattices reveal an extended region of the phase diagram where long-range magnetic order vanishes in the thermodynamic limit, while the overlap order parameter, which characterizes quantum spin glass states, remains finite. These findings, supported by a semiclassical analysis based on a large-spin expansion, provide compelling evidence that the spin glass phase is stable against quantum fluctuations, unlike the classical case where it disappears at any finite temperature.

Quantum Spin Glass in the Two-Dimensional Disordered Heisenberg Model via Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States

TL;DR

The paper addresses the existence of a quantum spin-glass phase in a two-dimensional disordered Heisenberg model by employing Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States (FNQS) to efficiently compute disorder-averaged ground-state properties across many realizations, mitigating the sign problem and boundary-condition issues. It identifies an intermediate quantum spin-glass region between ferromagnetic and antiferromagnetic phases, evidenced by a finite overlap order parameter when magnetic orders vanish, with phase boundaries near and . A complementary semiclassical Holstein-Primakoff spin-wave analysis shows that quantum fluctuations do not destroy the spin-glass order at leading order in , with agreeing with the fully quantum FNQS results at . The work demonstrates FNQS as a scalable method for disordered quantum magnets and provides a coherent 2D phase diagram, highlighting the robustness of QSG phases against quantum fluctuations and motivating future studies of low-energy excitations and potential spin-liquid regimes near phase boundaries.

Abstract

We investigate the two-dimensional frustrated quantum Heisenberg model with bond disorder on nearest-neighbor couplings using the recently introduced Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States framework, which enables accurate and efficient computation of disorder-averaged observables with a single variational optimization. Simulations on large lattices reveal an extended region of the phase diagram where long-range magnetic order vanishes in the thermodynamic limit, while the overlap order parameter, which characterizes quantum spin glass states, remains finite. These findings, supported by a semiclassical analysis based on a large-spin expansion, provide compelling evidence that the spin glass phase is stable against quantum fluctuations, unlike the classical case where it disappears at any finite temperature.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 10 sections, 7 equations, 7 figures.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: Ground-state phase diagram of the disordered Heisenberg model [see Eq. \ref{['eq:ham_model']}] in the thermodynamic limit, as a function of the probability $p \in [0,1]$ [see Eq. \ref{['eq:prob_couplings']}]. Three distinct phases are identified: a ferromagnetic phase for ${p \le p_{\mathrm{FM}} \approx 0.2}$, an antiferromagnetic phase for ${p \ge p_{\mathrm{AFM}} \approx 0.8}$, and an intermediate quantum spin glass phase characterized by the absence of magnetic order and a finite overlap parameter $Q$ (see Order parameters for details). The phase diagram is obtained using the variational approach based on Foundation Neural-Network Quantum States (refer to Methods).
  • Figure 2: Left panel: Ferromagnetic order parameter $\mathcal{M}^2_{\text{Ferro}}$ (blue circles, dashed lines) and Néel antiferromagnetic order parameter $\mathcal{M}^2_{\text{N\'eel}}$ (red squares, dashed lines) are shown as a function of the probability $p$ for system sizes ranging from $L=4$ to $L=14$. Extrapolated values in the thermodynamic limit (TL), obtained via finite-size scaling in $1/L$ (see \ref{['sec:extrapolations']} of the Methods for details), are indicated by solid lines connecting the corresponding symbols. Right panel: Overlap order parameter $Q$ (green circles, dashed lines) as a function of $p$ for the same system sizes and averaging procedure. Extrapolated TL values are shown as green circles connected by a solid line. Results in both panels are averaged over $\mathcal{R} = 600$ disorder realizations. The error on the extrapolated values in the thermodynamic limit are estimated via a resampling technique with Gaussian noise. The semiclassical value of the overlap obtained in the TL of the non-interacting spin-wave theory is shown for comparison (orange rhombi), in great agreement with the FNQS values (see Semiclassical analysis for the details).
  • Figure 3: Finite-size scaling of the overlap order parameter $Q$ [see Eq. \ref{['eq:overlap_order_par']}] as a function of the inverse system size $1/L$ for $L = 4$ to $L = 14$ at $p = 0.5$. Quadratic (solid line and yellow circle) and power-law (dashed line and green circle) fits are performed over all data points, while a linear fit (dotted line and red circle) is applied to the last three points. Inset: Zoom of the extrapolations close to $1/L \to 0$. The error bars of the extrapolated values in the thermodynamic limit are estimated via a resampling technique with Gaussian noise. The red star indicating the extrapolated value at $p = 1.0$ is showed for comparison.
  • Figure 4: Semiclassical prediction for the overlap order parameter in the thermodynamic limit as a function of the inverse spin representation $1/S$ at $p=0.5$. On the vertical axes we plot $Q_{\text{SW}}$ [see Eq. \ref{['eq:Qlsw']}] divided by $4S^2$ to have a comparison with the FNQS result at $S=\tfrac{1}{2}$ and at the same time with the classical value $Q_0 / (4S^2) = 0.1443$ (see main text for the definition). The semiclassical correction is obtained through a non-interacting spin wave-theory computation (see Semiclassical analysis and the SI Appendix for details). For $S=\tfrac{1}{2}$ the value of the overlap is compatible with the value obtained for the fully quantum model with the FNQS, within the error bars.
  • Figure 5: Spin-spin correlations for a disorder realization with $p = 0.7$ on a $6 \times 6$ cluster. The two-dimensional lattice is unrolled using the row-major convention for visualization. Exact diagonalization results (blue empty circles) are compared with variational calculations: an NQS optimized on the specific realization (green circles), and two FNQS models optimized over $\mathcal{R} = 600$ independent disorder realizations. A smaller FNQS (orange triangles) with $P \approx 8\times10^5$ parameters and a larger FNQS-L (red triangles) with $P \approx 1.2\times10^6$ parameters. The inset shows the corresponding spin structure factor along the path connecting $\mathbf{k} = (0,0)$ and $\mathbf{k} = (\pi,\pi)$.
  • ...and 2 more figures