Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Numerical and data-driven modeling of spall failure in polycrystalline ductile materials

Indrashish Saha, Lori Graham-Brady

TL;DR

This work develops a physics-based, crystal-plasticity–cohesive-zone numerical model to simulate spall failure in polycrystalline copper under plate impact and generates a large dataset of velocity fields. It compares three data-driven surrogates—3D U-Net, FNO-3D, and U-FNO—for predicting the spatiotemporal velocity response from microstructure inputs, finding that U-FNO and 3D U-Net deliver superior accuracy while FNO-3D underperforms, particularly near grain boundaries. The surrogates generalize reasonably to morphologies near the training distribution, with performance degrading for highly different grain counts and orientations; training cost favors 3D U-Net, while U-FNO offers similar accuracy at higher computational expense. A small-scale Bayesian optimization example demonstrates that DL surrogates can accelerate microstructure design by about two orders of magnitude, enabling rapid exploration of spall-strength targets while acknowledging some uncertainty in out-of-distribution predictions.

Abstract

Developing materials with tailored mechanical performance requires iteration over a large number of proposed designs. When considering dynamic fracture, experiments at every iteration are usually infeasible. While high-fidelity, physics-based simulations can potentially reduce experimental efforts, they remain computationally expensive. As a faster alternative, key dynamic properties can be predicted directly from microstructural images using deep-learning surrogate models. In this work, the spallation of ductile polycrystals under plate-impact loading at strain rates of O(10^6 s^-1) is considered. A physics-based numerical model that couples crystal plasticity and a cohesive zone model is used to generate data for the surrogate models. Three architectures - 3D U-Net, 3D Fourier Neural Operator (FNO-3D), and U-FNO were trained on the particle-velocity field data from the numerical model. The generalization of the models was evaluated using microstructures with varying grain sizes and aspect ratios. U-FNO and 3D U-Net performed significantly better than FNO-3D across all datasets. Furthermore, U-FNO and 3D U-Net exhibited comparable accuracy for every metric considered in this study. However, training the U-FNO requires almost twice the computational effort compared to the 3D U-Net, making it a desirable option for a surrogate model.

Numerical and data-driven modeling of spall failure in polycrystalline ductile materials

TL;DR

This work develops a physics-based, crystal-plasticity–cohesive-zone numerical model to simulate spall failure in polycrystalline copper under plate impact and generates a large dataset of velocity fields. It compares three data-driven surrogates—3D U-Net, FNO-3D, and U-FNO—for predicting the spatiotemporal velocity response from microstructure inputs, finding that U-FNO and 3D U-Net deliver superior accuracy while FNO-3D underperforms, particularly near grain boundaries. The surrogates generalize reasonably to morphologies near the training distribution, with performance degrading for highly different grain counts and orientations; training cost favors 3D U-Net, while U-FNO offers similar accuracy at higher computational expense. A small-scale Bayesian optimization example demonstrates that DL surrogates can accelerate microstructure design by about two orders of magnitude, enabling rapid exploration of spall-strength targets while acknowledging some uncertainty in out-of-distribution predictions.

Abstract

Developing materials with tailored mechanical performance requires iteration over a large number of proposed designs. When considering dynamic fracture, experiments at every iteration are usually infeasible. While high-fidelity, physics-based simulations can potentially reduce experimental efforts, they remain computationally expensive. As a faster alternative, key dynamic properties can be predicted directly from microstructural images using deep-learning surrogate models. In this work, the spallation of ductile polycrystals under plate-impact loading at strain rates of O(10^6 s^-1) is considered. A physics-based numerical model that couples crystal plasticity and a cohesive zone model is used to generate data for the surrogate models. Three architectures - 3D U-Net, 3D Fourier Neural Operator (FNO-3D), and U-FNO were trained on the particle-velocity field data from the numerical model. The generalization of the models was evaluated using microstructures with varying grain sizes and aspect ratios. U-FNO and 3D U-Net performed significantly better than FNO-3D across all datasets. Furthermore, U-FNO and 3D U-Net exhibited comparable accuracy for every metric considered in this study. However, training the U-FNO requires almost twice the computational effort compared to the 3D U-Net, making it a desirable option for a surrogate model.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 25 sections, 19 equations, 22 figures, 5 tables.

Figures (22)

  • Figure 1: (a)Experimental setup depicting a flyer plate driven into a target plate made of a polycrystalline ductile material (b) A typical free surface velocity trace obtained from the back face of the target plate using PDV (c) Interaction of waves in the material and around the spall plane using a $x-t$ diagram (d) Damage growth inside the material from the nucleation of voids around grain boundaries to their coalescence and finally fracture at the grain boundaries
  • Figure 2: (a) 2D synthetic microstructure of size $200 \mu m \times 200\mu m$ and 30 grains generated using Neper QUEY20111729 (b) Meshed microstructure consisting of $16996$ CPE3 elements and $784$ COH2D4 elements (c) Meshed microstructure with the applied boundary conditions (d) Pulse function used to simulate impact loading. The actual function is defined in Eq. \ref{['eq:pulse_function']}.
  • Figure 3: Decomposition of the deformation gradient following Eq. \ref{['eq:decomposition']} in finite strain elasto-plasticity theory.
  • Figure 4: (a) Grain boundary cohesive energy as a function of misorientation angle between two grains. The values are normalized by $\Gamma_{max}$ (b)Traction separation law normalized on $\delta_f$ and dependent on the misorientation of grain boundaries. The pink region shows the spread due to the misorientation. The curve also shows the traction separation curve for $\Delta \theta = 0^\circ$ which is significantly higher than the grain boundaries.
  • Figure 5: (a) Magnified region in a polycrystal domain showing the mesh with element sizes $1 \mu m$, $2.5 \mu m$, $4 \mu m$ and $8.0 \mu m$ (b) Free surface velocity traces for different mesh sizes (c) Spall strength variation with the change in mesh size.
  • ...and 17 more figures