Numerical and data-driven modeling of spall failure in polycrystalline ductile materials
Indrashish Saha, Lori Graham-Brady
TL;DR
This work develops a physics-based, crystal-plasticity–cohesive-zone numerical model to simulate spall failure in polycrystalline copper under plate impact and generates a large dataset of velocity fields. It compares three data-driven surrogates—3D U-Net, FNO-3D, and U-FNO—for predicting the spatiotemporal velocity response from microstructure inputs, finding that U-FNO and 3D U-Net deliver superior accuracy while FNO-3D underperforms, particularly near grain boundaries. The surrogates generalize reasonably to morphologies near the training distribution, with performance degrading for highly different grain counts and orientations; training cost favors 3D U-Net, while U-FNO offers similar accuracy at higher computational expense. A small-scale Bayesian optimization example demonstrates that DL surrogates can accelerate microstructure design by about two orders of magnitude, enabling rapid exploration of spall-strength targets while acknowledging some uncertainty in out-of-distribution predictions.
Abstract
Developing materials with tailored mechanical performance requires iteration over a large number of proposed designs. When considering dynamic fracture, experiments at every iteration are usually infeasible. While high-fidelity, physics-based simulations can potentially reduce experimental efforts, they remain computationally expensive. As a faster alternative, key dynamic properties can be predicted directly from microstructural images using deep-learning surrogate models. In this work, the spallation of ductile polycrystals under plate-impact loading at strain rates of O(10^6 s^-1) is considered. A physics-based numerical model that couples crystal plasticity and a cohesive zone model is used to generate data for the surrogate models. Three architectures - 3D U-Net, 3D Fourier Neural Operator (FNO-3D), and U-FNO were trained on the particle-velocity field data from the numerical model. The generalization of the models was evaluated using microstructures with varying grain sizes and aspect ratios. U-FNO and 3D U-Net performed significantly better than FNO-3D across all datasets. Furthermore, U-FNO and 3D U-Net exhibited comparable accuracy for every metric considered in this study. However, training the U-FNO requires almost twice the computational effort compared to the 3D U-Net, making it a desirable option for a surrogate model.
