Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Classification of four-qubit pure codes and five-qubit absolutely maximally entangled states

Ian Tan

TL;DR

The work addresses the classification of highly entangled quantum codes by marrying quantum information with Vinberg invariant theory. It shows that every 5-qubit AME state is LU-equivalent to a point in the unique ((5,2,3)) code C1, with equivalence governed by a finite group of order 24, and that every 4-qubit pure code is LU-equivalent to a subspace of the unique ((4,4,2)) code C2. The authors develop a Vinberg-theoretic framework to connect 4-qubit state spaces to graded Lie algebras, enabling a precise embedding and the construction of a 3-uniform infinite family of even-n states. They further provide a separating invariant set of polynomials (degrees 6, 8, 12) that fully distinguishes SU(2)⊗5 orbits of 5-qubit AME states, offering a practical criterion for equivalence. Overall, the paper advances the classification of maximally entangled states and their associated quantum codes through a synthesis of invariant theory, Lie theory, and quantum information.

Abstract

We prove that every 5-qubit absolutely maximally entangled (AME) state is equivalent by a local unitary transformation to a point in the unique ((5,2,3)) quantum error correcting code C. Furthermore, two points in C are equivalent if and only if they are related by a group of order 24 acting on C. There exists a set of 3 invariant polynomials that separates equivalence classes of 5-qubit AME states. We also show that every 4-qubit pure code is equivalent to a subspace of the unique ((4,4,2)) and construct an infinite family of 3-uniform n-qubit states for even $n\geq 6$. The proofs rely heavily on results from Vinberg and classical invariant theory.

Classification of four-qubit pure codes and five-qubit absolutely maximally entangled states

TL;DR

The work addresses the classification of highly entangled quantum codes by marrying quantum information with Vinberg invariant theory. It shows that every 5-qubit AME state is LU-equivalent to a point in the unique ((5,2,3)) code C1, with equivalence governed by a finite group of order 24, and that every 4-qubit pure code is LU-equivalent to a subspace of the unique ((4,4,2)) code C2. The authors develop a Vinberg-theoretic framework to connect 4-qubit state spaces to graded Lie algebras, enabling a precise embedding and the construction of a 3-uniform infinite family of even-n states. They further provide a separating invariant set of polynomials (degrees 6, 8, 12) that fully distinguishes SU(2)⊗5 orbits of 5-qubit AME states, offering a practical criterion for equivalence. Overall, the paper advances the classification of maximally entangled states and their associated quantum codes through a synthesis of invariant theory, Lie theory, and quantum information.

Abstract

We prove that every 5-qubit absolutely maximally entangled (AME) state is equivalent by a local unitary transformation to a point in the unique ((5,2,3)) quantum error correcting code C. Furthermore, two points in C are equivalent if and only if they are related by a group of order 24 acting on C. There exists a set of 3 invariant polynomials that separates equivalence classes of 5-qubit AME states. We also show that every 4-qubit pure code is equivalent to a subspace of the unique ((4,4,2)) and construct an infinite family of 3-uniform n-qubit states for even . The proofs rely heavily on results from Vinberg and classical invariant theory.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 26 sections, 36 theorems, 60 equations, 2 tables.

Key Result

theorem 1.1

The set of 1-uniform states in $(\mathbb C^2)^{\otimes 4}$ is equal to $\operatorname{SU}_2^{\otimes 4}\mathcal{C}_2$. Two points in $\mathcal{C}_2$ are $\operatorname{SU}_2^{\times 4}$-equivalent if and only if they are $W$-equivalent, where $W$ is the Weyl group of the Lie algebra $\mathfrak{so}_8

Theorems & Definitions (72)

  • theorem 1.1: Classification of 4-qubit critical states
  • proof
  • theorem 1.2: Main theorem
  • Definition 2.1
  • theorem 2.2: Quantum Singleton bound
  • proof
  • theorem 2.3: Rains
  • proof
  • theorem 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 62 more