Insights from Educators on Building a More Cohesive Quantum Information Science and Engineering Education Ecosystem
Shams El-Adawy, A. R. Piña, Benjamin M. Zwickl, H. J. Lewandowski
TL;DR
The paper investigates how educators design, implement, and sustain Quantum Information Science and Engineering education amid rapid growth and industry demand. It uses a combined 3P-6Cs curriculum framework and SWOT analysis to identify cross-cutting goals, content, collaboration, data practices, and external partnerships at the course and program levels. Key contributions include a structured synthesis of educator experiences across 15 institutions, highlighting practical strategies (e.g., embedding QISE into existing courses, cross-disciplinary program development) and challenges (bureaucracy, resource constraints, industry alignment, data collection gaps). The work offers a community-level blueprint for building a cohesive QISE education ecosystem and argues for mechanisms like cross-institution collaboration and a national quantum education center to coordinate curriculum, resources, and workforce-relevant evaluation. The findings have practical implications for educators, program leaders, and policymakers aiming to align QISE training with evolving quantum industry needs.
Abstract
As the need for a quantum-ready workforce grows, educators in Quantum Information Science and Engineering (QISE) face the challenge of aligning their programs and courses with industry needs. Through a series of interviews with program directors and faculty across 15 different institutions, we identified the considerations that educators are currently addressing as they develop their various courses and programs. Grounded in a curriculum framework, we conducted a Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) analysis, which revealed shared challenges and opportunities about program context, curriculum development, collaboration, program data collection and evaluation, and connections across stakeholders in the quantum ecosystem that educators should consider when developing their QISE efforts. Our findings highlight five overreaching themes: (1) the strategic ways educators navigate institutional structures to support QISE initiatives, (2) the ongoing challenge of aligning QISE curricula with industry and institutional needs, (3) the importance of fostering interdisciplinary collaboration across departments and institutions in QISE, (4) the need for robust data collection and evaluation to inform QISE course and program development, and (5) the importance of strengthening industry-academia connections to prepare students for the quantum workforce. The details and interconnections in our findings illustrate the value of applying a structured approach to QISE course and program development with the goal of creating a more cohesive QISE education ecosystem.