Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Efficient first-principles inverse design of nanolasers

Beñat Martinez de Aguirre Jokisch, Alexander Cerjan, Rasmus Ellebæk Christiansen, Jesper Mørk, Ole Sigmund, Steven G. Johnson

Abstract

We develop and demonstrate a first-principles approach, based on the nonlinear Maxwell-Bloch equations and steady-state ab-initio laser theory (SALT), for inverse design of nanostructured lasers, incorporating spatial hole-burning corrections, threshold effects, out-coupling efficiency, and gain diffusion. The resulting figure of merit exploits the high-$Q$ regime of optimized laser cavities to perturbatively simplify the nonlinear model to a single linear ''reciprocal'' Maxwell solve. The consequences for laser-cavity design, and in particular the strong dependence on the nature of the gain region, are demonstrated using topology optimization of both 2d and full 3d geometries.

Efficient first-principles inverse design of nanolasers

Abstract

We develop and demonstrate a first-principles approach, based on the nonlinear Maxwell-Bloch equations and steady-state ab-initio laser theory (SALT), for inverse design of nanostructured lasers, incorporating spatial hole-burning corrections, threshold effects, out-coupling efficiency, and gain diffusion. The resulting figure of merit exploits the high- regime of optimized laser cavities to perturbatively simplify the nonlinear model to a single linear ''reciprocal'' Maxwell solve. The consequences for laser-cavity design, and in particular the strong dependence on the nature of the gain region, are demonstrated using topology optimization of both 2d and full 3d geometries.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 26 sections, 47 equations, 7 figures, 1 table.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: (a) Schematic nanolaser: pump power $P_\text{pump}$ excites a gain profile $D_0$ and a lasing mode that outputs power $P_\text{out}$ into a channel (waveguide), for a cavity (from Sec. \ref{['sec:benchmark']}) that maximizes efficiency $\sim P_\text{out} / P_\text{pump}$. (b) Lasing amplitude $|a_0|^2$ ($\sim\text{energy}$) vs. pump strength $d$, lasing above a threshold $d_\text{thresh}$. (c) Change $\Im\{\Delta \omega \}$ in modal gain/loss depends nonlinearly on amplitude $|a|^2$, and stabilizes at $|a_0|^2$, where $\Im\{\Delta \omega\}=$ passive cavity loss $\gamma_0$.
  • Figure 2: Coupled optical system composed of a waveguide guiding an input field with amplitude $s_\text{in}$ and an output field with amplitude $s_\text{out}$, coupled to a cavity with an amplitude $a_1$ through the decay rate $\tau_\text{wg}$.
  • Figure 3: Performance of inverse designed devices for increasing active region sizes $\sigma_{\text{g}}$. (a) Evaluation of the nonlinear FOM normalized by the gain region size-dependent factor $\zeta(\sigma_g)=\max\left\{|\mathbf{E}_\text{in}|^2\right\}\left(\int_\Omega D^*_0(\sigma_g) \mathop{}\!\mathrm{d} \Omega\right)^2$, for designs optimized for the naive FOM (green) and nonlinear FOM (yellow). The gain profile $D_0$ is shown in (b), (c), and (d) in max-normalized units for increasing active region sizes. The standard deviation $\sigma_{\text{g}}$ of the gain profile is marked in a dashed white line. In the gain profile for the nonlinear device in (d), the active region size $\sigma_{\text{g}}$ is explicitly shown for illustration purposes.
  • Figure 4: Electric-field norm $|\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})|$ in devices optimized for a gain medium of standard deviation $\sigma_{\text{g}} = 500$ nm. The fields are expressed in max-normalized units.
  • Figure 5: Spatial profile of the gain medium $D_0(\mathbf{r})$ with a standard deviation $\sigma_{\text{g}}=250$ nm, the diffused gain medium $\mathbb{S}[D_0](\mathbf{r})$, for a diffusion length of $R_0=5\,\upmu\text{m}$, and the electric-field norm $|\mathbf{E}(\mathbf{r})|$ of the cavity mode for the inverse designed cavity not accounting (left) and accounting (right) for diffusion. All fields are expressed in max-normalized units.
  • ...and 2 more figures