Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Low complexity binary words avoiding $(5/2)^+$-powers

James Currie, Narad Rampersad

TL;DR

This work gives a precise, Restivo‑Salemi–style structure theorem for binary Rote words that avoid $(5/2)^+$‑powers, confirming a conjecture of Ollinger and Shallit. The authors develop a two‑tier description: (i) a First Structure Theorem showing that final segments of proper words are obtained via the morphisms $f$ (and $h$ for antiproper words), and (ii) a Second Structure Theorem classifying Rote words by their length‑4 factor sets and proving that final segments are of the form $g^*(f^n(oldsymbol{u}))$ (and variants with complements/reversals) where $oldsymbol{u}$ is proper. The approach combines careful combinatorial analysis of 4‑letter factors with recursive morphic constructions and is complemented by computational backtracking that validates the imposed length bounds. The results provide a complete, recursive description of the low‑complexity, $(5/2)^+$‑power‑free Rote words, linking their structure to explicit morphisms and offering a template for analogous results in related power‑free word classes.

Abstract

Rote words are infinite words that contain $2n$ factors of length $n$ for every $n \geq 1$. Shallit and Shur, as well as Ollinger and Shallit, showed that there are Rote words that avoid $(5/2)^+$-powers and that this is best possible. In this note we give a structure theorem for the Rote words that avoid $(5/2)^+$-powers, confirming a conjecture of Ollinger and Shallit.

Low complexity binary words avoiding $(5/2)^+$-powers

TL;DR

This work gives a precise, Restivo‑Salemi–style structure theorem for binary Rote words that avoid ‑powers, confirming a conjecture of Ollinger and Shallit. The authors develop a two‑tier description: (i) a First Structure Theorem showing that final segments of proper words are obtained via the morphisms (and for antiproper words), and (ii) a Second Structure Theorem classifying Rote words by their length‑4 factor sets and proving that final segments are of the form (and variants with complements/reversals) where is proper. The approach combines careful combinatorial analysis of 4‑letter factors with recursive morphic constructions and is complemented by computational backtracking that validates the imposed length bounds. The results provide a complete, recursive description of the low‑complexity, ‑power‑free Rote words, linking their structure to explicit morphisms and offering a template for analogous results in related power‑free word classes.

Abstract

Rote words are infinite words that contain factors of length for every . Shallit and Shur, as well as Ollinger and Shallit, showed that there are Rote words that avoid -powers and that this is best possible. In this note we give a structure theorem for the Rote words that avoid -powers, confirming a conjecture of Ollinger and Shallit.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 11 theorems, 18 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

(First Structure Theorem)

Theorems & Definitions (23)

  • Definition 1
  • Theorem 1
  • Definition 2
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3
  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof
  • Lemma 3
  • ...and 13 more