What is a good use case for quantum computers?
Michael Marthaler, Peter Pinski, Vladimir Rybkin, Iris Schwenk, Pascal Stadler, Marina Walt
TL;DR
The paper presents the ITBQ four-step framework (Identify, Transform, Benchmark, Show Quantum Advantage) to systematically evaluate quantum-use cases and highlights the gaps in current literature regarding problem translation and classical benchmarking. Through three case studies—NMR, multireference chemistry, and diradicals—it demonstrates how careful Transform-to-Quantum procedures, coupled with rigorous classical baselines and targeted quantum algorithms, shape realistic assessments of quantum advantage. It argues that connecting abstract quantum models to real-world problems is essential and that robust software tools (e.g., ASF) and problem-aware benchmarking are critical to progress. The work underscores that while quantum advantage is plausible in carefully constructed maps (e.g., active spaces with RPA corrections or spin-boson mappings), mature classical methods and workflow integration presently limit universal, industry-wide gains, making transparent evaluation and targeted investment crucial for practical impact.
Abstract
Identify, Transform, Benchmark, Show Quantum Advantage (ITBQ): Evaluating use cases for quantum computers. We introduce a four-step framework for assessing quantum computing applications -- from identifying relevant industry problems to demonstrating quantum advantage -- addressing steps often overlooked in the literature, such as rigorous benchmarking against classical solutions and the challenge of translating real-world tasks onto quantum hardware. Applying this framework to cases like NMR, multireference chemistry, and radicals reveals both significant opportunities and key barriers on the path to practical advantage. Our results highlight the need for transparent, structured criteria to focus research, guide investment, and accelerate meaningful quantum progress.
