Voltage Stability of Inverter-Based Systems: Impact of Parameters and Irrelevance of Line Dynamics
Sushobhan Chatterjee, Sijia Geng
TL;DR
This paper addresses voltage stability in inverter-based power systems by analyzing fold and saddle-node bifurcations and deriving a closed-form sensitivity of the stability margin using the normal vector to the bifurcation surface, enabling efficient parameter tuning. It proves that transmission line dynamics do not affect these bifurcations for both grid-following and grid-forming inverters, allowing accurate margin estimation with static-line models. The authors identify the most effective control channels: for GFL inverters, the reactive-load setpoint and current-control feedforward gain, and for GFM inverters, the voltage-control feedforward gain, supported by a practical normal-vector based sensitivity formula. Collectively, these results reduce model and parameter complexity and provide a scalable framework for voltage-stability analysis in future inverter-dominated grids.
Abstract
This paper investigates voltage stability in inverter-based power systems concerning fold and saddle-node bifurcations. An analytical expression is derived for the sensitivity of the stability margin using the normal vector to the bifurcation hypersurface. Such information enables efficient identification of effective control parameters in mitigating voltage instability. Comprehensive analysis reveals that reactive loading setpoint and current controller's feedforward gain are the most influential parameters for enhancing voltage stability in a grid-following (GFL) inverter system, while the voltage controller's feedforward gain plays a dominant role in a grid-forming (GFM) inverter. Notably, both theoretical and numerical results demonstrate that transmission line dynamics have no impact on fold/saddle-node bifurcations in these systems. Results in this paper provide insights for efficient analysis and control in future inverter-dominated power systems through reductions in parameter space and model complexity.
