A data-driven analysis of the impact of non-compliant individuals on epidemic diffusion in urban settings
Fabio Mazza, Marco Brambilla, Carlo Piccardi, Francesco Pierri
TL;DR
This work addresses how behavioural non-compliance alters epidemic diffusion in urban settings by developing a data-driven, two-layer city contact framework and a heterogeneous HeSIR model that distinguishes ordinary (O) and non-compliant (M) individuals. The authors implement a discrete-time, tile-based network for three Italian cities and compare uniform versus data-driven distributions of non-compliant individuals, finding that local clustering can create infection hotspots even when city-wide effects are modest. Key findings show that non-compliance accelerates spread and raises peaks at moderate transmission, with greater local impact driven by spatially concentrated non-compliant groups and by higher susceptibility. The results highlight the importance of monitoring local compliance and tailoring interventions to spatial patterns, while also revealing how network structure mediates the translation of behavioural heterogeneity into epidemic outcomes.
Abstract
Individuals who do not comply with public health safety measures pose a significant challenge to effective epidemic control, as their risky behaviours can undermine public health interventions. This is particularly relevant in urban environments because of their high population density and complex social interactions. In this study, we employ detailed contact networks, built using a data-driven approach, to examine the impact of non-compliant individuals on epidemic dynamics in three major Italian cities: Torino, Milano, and Palermo. We use a heterogeneous extension of the Susceptible-Infected-Recovered model that distinguishes between ordinary and non-compliant individuals, who are more infectious and/or more susceptible. By combining electoral data with recent findings on vaccine hesitancy, we obtain spatially heterogeneous distributions of non-compliance. Epidemic simulations demonstrate that even a small proportion of non-compliant individuals in the population can substantially increase the number of infections and accelerate the timing of their peak. Furthermore, the impact of non-compliance is greatest when disease transmission rates are moderate. Including the heterogeneous, data-driven distribution of non-compliance in the simulations results in infection hotspots forming with varying intensity according to the disease transmission rate. Overall, these findings emphasise the importance of monitoring behavioural compliance and tailoring public health interventions to address localised risks.
