Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Ramanujan's partition generating functions modulo $\ell$

Kathrin Bringmann, William Craig, Ken Ono

TL;DR

This work addresses Ramanujan-type partition congruences modulo primes $\ell\ge5$ by deriving a closed-form expression for $P_\ell(q)$ in $\mathbb{F}_\ell[[q]]$, namely $P_\ell(q)\equiv c_\ell \frac{T_\ell(q)}{(q^\ell;q^\ell)_\infty} \pmod{\ell}$, where $T_\ell(q)$ records Hecke traces of weight $\ell-1$ cusp forms. The approach combines generalized pentagonal recurrences for $p(n)$ (via modular forms $R_k(z)$ built from $\eta$) with a detailed congruence analysis of the Hecke-trace generating function $T_{\ell}(q)$ and a matching theta-series to align generating functions modulo $\ell$. Key contributions include a new proof of Ramanujan's congruences for $\ell=5,7,11$ (where no nontrivial cusp forms exist in the relevant weights) and a uniform, explicit expression for $P_\ell(q)$ in terms of $\ell$-ramified Hecke data, with the constant $c_\ell$ given modulo $\ell$. This work deepens the link between partition arithmetic and the theory of modular forms, offering a practical framework to derive partition congruences modulo primes using Hecke-theoretic inputs.

Abstract

For the partition function $p(n)$, Ramanujan proved the striking identities $$ P_5(q):=\sum_{n\geq 0} p(5n+4)q^n =5\prod_{n\geq 1} \frac{\left(q^5;q^5\right)_{\infty}^5}{(q;q)_{\infty}^6}, $$ $$ P_7(q):=\sum_{n\geq 0} p(7n+5)q^n =7\prod_{n\geq 1}\frac{\left(q^7;q^7\right)_{\infty}^3}{(q;q)_{\infty}^4}+49q \prod_{n\geq 1}\frac{\left(q^7;q^7\right)_{\infty}^7}{(q;q)_{\infty}^8}, $$ where $(q;q)_{\infty}:=\prod_{n\geq 1}(1-q^n).$ As these identities imply his celebrated congruences modulo 5 and 7, it is natural to seek, for primes $\ell \geq 5,$ closed form expressions of the power series $$ P_{\ell}(q):=\sum_{n\geq 0} p(\ell n-δ_{\ell})q^n\pmod{\ell}, $$ where $δ_{\ell}:=\frac{\ell^2-1}{24}.$ In this paper, we prove that $$ P_{\ell}(q)\equiv c_{\ell} \frac{T_{\ell}(q)}{ (q^\ell; q^\ell )_\infty} \pmod{\ell}, $$ where $c_{\ell}\in \mathbb{Z}$ is explicit and $T_{\ell}(q)$ is the generating function for the Hecke traces of $\ell$-ramified values of special Dirichlet series for weight $\ell-1$ cusp forms on $SL_2(\mathbb{Z})$. This is a new proof of Ramanujan's congruences modulo 5, 7, and 11, as there are no nontrivial cusp forms of weight 4, 6, and 10.

Ramanujan's partition generating functions modulo $\ell$

TL;DR

This work addresses Ramanujan-type partition congruences modulo primes by deriving a closed-form expression for in , namely , where records Hecke traces of weight cusp forms. The approach combines generalized pentagonal recurrences for (via modular forms built from ) with a detailed congruence analysis of the Hecke-trace generating function and a matching theta-series to align generating functions modulo . Key contributions include a new proof of Ramanujan's congruences for (where no nontrivial cusp forms exist in the relevant weights) and a uniform, explicit expression for in terms of -ramified Hecke data, with the constant given modulo . This work deepens the link between partition arithmetic and the theory of modular forms, offering a practical framework to derive partition congruences modulo primes using Hecke-theoretic inputs.

Abstract

For the partition function , Ramanujan proved the striking identities where As these identities imply his celebrated congruences modulo 5 and 7, it is natural to seek, for primes closed form expressions of the power series where In this paper, we prove that where is explicit and is the generating function for the Hecke traces of -ramified values of special Dirichlet series for weight cusp forms on . This is a new proof of Ramanujan's congruences modulo 5, 7, and 11, as there are no nontrivial cusp forms of weight 4, 6, and 10.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 3 sections, 7 theorems, 51 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

If $\ell \geq 5$ is a prime, then where $c_{\ell}:= 2\cdot\overline3 (\frac{-1}{\ell}) (\frac{\ell+1}{2})!^{\ell-3} \ \left( \mathrm{mod} \, \ell \right)$, where throughout $\overline a$ denotes the inverse of $a\ \left( \mathrm{mod} \, \ell \right)$ and where $(\frac{\cdot}{\cdot})$ denotes the Kronecker symbol.

Theorems & Definitions (10)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Corollary 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • Example
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Corollary 2.3
  • Proposition 3.1
  • proof
  • proof : Proof of Theorem \ref{['Theorem1']}