Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The size of the sync basin resolved

Pablo Groisman, Cecilia De Vita, Julián Fernández Bonder, Yuanzhao Zhang

Abstract

Sparsely coupled Kuramoto oscillators offer a fertile playground for exploring high-dimensional basins of attraction due to their simple yet multistable dynamics. For $n$ identical Kuramoto oscillators on cycle graphs, it is well known that the only attractors are twisted states, whose phases wind around the circle with a constant gap between neighboring oscillators ($θ_j = 2πq j/n$). It was conjectured in 2006 that basin sizes of these twisted states scale as $e^{-kq^2}$ to the winding number $q$. Here, we provide new numerical and analytical evidence supporting the conjecture and uncover the dynamical mechanism behind the Gaussian scaling. The key idea is that, when starting with a random initial condition, the winding number of the solution stabilizes rapidly at $t \propto \log n$, before long-range correlation can develop among oscillators. This timescale separation allows us to calculate the winding number as a sum of weakly-dependent random variables, leading to a Central Limit Theorem derivation of the basin scaling.

The size of the sync basin resolved

Abstract

Sparsely coupled Kuramoto oscillators offer a fertile playground for exploring high-dimensional basins of attraction due to their simple yet multistable dynamics. For identical Kuramoto oscillators on cycle graphs, it is well known that the only attractors are twisted states, whose phases wind around the circle with a constant gap between neighboring oscillators (). It was conjectured in 2006 that basin sizes of these twisted states scale as to the winding number . Here, we provide new numerical and analytical evidence supporting the conjecture and uncover the dynamical mechanism behind the Gaussian scaling. The key idea is that, when starting with a random initial condition, the winding number of the solution stabilizes rapidly at , before long-range correlation can develop among oscillators. This timescale separation allows us to calculate the winding number as a sum of weakly-dependent random variables, leading to a Central Limit Theorem derivation of the basin scaling.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 21 equations, 4 figures.

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Distribution of the winding number $q$ at different times $t$ when starting from random initial conditions at $t=0$. The distribution remains Gaussian for all $t$, with the variance gradually decreasing during the early stage of the evolution but quickly converges to its final shape. Here, we set the number of oscillators $n=1280$ and each distribution is estimated from $10^5$ samples.
  • Figure 2: Time till the winding number stops changing ($t_s$) and time till the system enters the invariant region $\mathcal{I}$ ($t_e$) both scale as $\log n$. This will be shown more rigorously in Step 3. Each curve is averaged over $10^4$ trajectories starting from random initial conditions and the shaded bands represent standard deviations. We always have $t_s \leq t_e$ for any individual trajectory, which is the point of Step 1.
  • Figure 3: No long-range correlation between oscillators can develop before the winding number stops changing. Here, for $n=1280$ oscillators, we calculate the Pearson correlation $r$ between two oscillators that are distance $d$ apart at $t=t_s$ (winding number stabilized) and $t=t_e$ (entering the invariant region $\mathcal{I}$). The shaded area mark the expected $|r|$ for two random vectors whose entries are chosen uniformly and independently between $-\pi$ and $\pi$, $\mathbb E(|r|) = \frac{\sqrt{2}}{\sqrt{\pi}\sqrt{n-1}}\approx 0.0223$. The oscillators are essentially uncorrelated unless they are very close to each other ($d \leq 6$). We show the lack of long-range correlation analytically in Step 2.
  • Figure 4: Distribution of the times $t_e^{(i)}$ at which phase differences $\eta_i$ enter $(-\pi/2,\pi/2)$. Half of the $\eta_i$ are already inside $(-\pi/2,\pi/2)$ for random initial conditions (thus the spike at $t=0$), while the nonzero entering times follow an exponential distribution. The data are collected from $10^4$ independent simulations of $n=1280$ Kuramoto oscillators from random initial conditions. The exponential distribution of $t_e^{(i)}$ is a key ingredient for Step 3.