Ab initio study of the radii of oxygen isotopes
Zhengxue Ren, Serdar Elhatisari, Ulf-G. Meißner
TL;DR
This work addresses the challenge of computing nuclear radii in ab initio frameworks by applying nuclear lattice effective field theory (NLEFT) with high-fidelity N$^3$LO chiral interactions to the oxygen isotopes $^{16}$O–$^{20}$O. A key contribution is the partial pinhole algorithm, which mitigates the Monte Carlo sign problem and enables reliable imaginary-time extrapolations to extract both charge and matter radii, including a prediction of $r_{ m ch}(^ {20} ext{O}) = 2.810(32)$ fm. The results show that charge radii for $^{16}$O–$^{18}$O align with experimental data, while matter radii agree with electron- and proton-scattering extractions but differ from cross-section–based methods, highlighting model dependencies in the latter. The study demonstrates the broader applicability of the partial pinhole technique to other observables and larger systems, offering precise theoretical benchmarks and insights into nuclear structure such as possible alpha-cluster configurations in $^{16}$O.
Abstract
We present an {\em ab initio} study of the charge and matter radii of oxygen isotopes from $^{16}$O to $^{20}$O using nuclear lattice effective field theory (NLEFT) with high-fidelity N$^3$LO chiral interactions. To efficiently address the Monte Carlo sign problem encountered in nuclear radius calculations, we introduce the {\em partial pinhole algorithm}, significantly reducing statistical uncertainties and extending the reach to more neutron-rich and proton-rich isotopes. Our computed charge radii for $^{16}$O, $^{17}$O, and $^{18}$O closely match experimental data, and we predict a charge radius of $2.810(32)$ fm for $^{20}$O. The calculated matter radii show excellent agreement with values extracted from low-energy proton and electron elastic scattering data, but are inconsistent with those derived from interaction cross sections and charge-changing cross section measurements. These discrepancies highlight model-dependent ambiguities in the experimental extraction methods of matter radii and underscore the value of precise theoretical benchmarks from NLEFT calculations.
