Social Construction of Urban Space: Using LLMs to Identify Neighborhood Boundaries From Craigslist Ads
Adam Visokay, Ruth Bagley, Ian Kennedy, Chris Hess, Kyle Crowder, Rob Voigt, Denis Peskoff
TL;DR
This study investigates how urban space is socially constructed by analyzing Craigslist rental ads in Chicago from 2018 to 2024. It combines manual labeling and zero-shot large language models to extract explicit neighborhood claims, compares these to a string-matching baseline, and anchors findings with geospatial centroids to define a 'social center' for each neighborhood. Through topic modeling (LDA) and regression analyses, the authors identify three linguistic substitution patterns—Conflicting Conceptions, Border Stretching, and Reputation Laundering—and show that listing language systematically shifts with distance from the social center. The work demonstrates scalable, transferable methods for examining contested urban boundaries and highlights how language shapes neighborhood reputation and property outcomes in the urban housing market.
Abstract
Rental listings offer a window into how urban space is socially constructed through language. We analyze Chicago Craigslist rental advertisements from 2018 to 2024 to examine how listing agents characterize neighborhoods, identifying mismatches between institutional boundaries and neighborhood claims. Through manual and large language model annotation, we classify unstructured listings from Craigslist according to their neighborhood. Further geospatial analysis reveals three distinct patterns: properties with conflicting neighborhood designations due to competing spatial definitions, border properties with valid claims to adjacent neighborhoods, and "reputation laundering" where listings claim association with distant, desirable neighborhoods. Through topic modeling, we identify patterns that correlate with spatial positioning: listings further from neighborhood centers emphasize different amenities than centrally-located units. Natural language processing techniques reveal how definitions of urban spaces are contested in ways that traditional methods overlook.
