Algebraic aspects of the polynomial Littlewood-Offord problem
Zhihan Jin, Matthew Kwan, Lisa Sauermann, Yiting Wang
TL;DR
The paper advances the algebraic understanding of the polynomial Littlewood--Offord problem by showing that unless a degree-$d$ polynomial $f$ is near a structured low-complexity form, one can improve anticoncentration beyond the general $n^{-1/2+o(1)}$ bound. It introduces a robust framework combining local-to-global tensor and matrix rank principles, decoupling, and inverse Littlewood--Offord theorems to establish power-saving anticoncentration results for multilinear and quadratic polynomials; in particular, optimal results are obtained for $d$-multilinear forms (with a $1$-exponent stability) and sharp bounds in the complex quadratic case. The work also disproves Costello’s conjecture in general via a counterexample and connects the polynomial LO problem to analytic number theory through affine-point-density considerations, suggesting deeper arithmetic underpinnings. Methodologically, the paper develops tensor- and matrix-rank property testing, refines decoupling techniques, and uses inverse-LO theorems to bridge high-dimensional random sums with low-dimensional algebraic structure, achieving new inverse-type results for higher-degree polynomials and clarifying the role of robust irreducibility in anticoncentration.
Abstract
Consider a degree-$d$ polynomial $f(ξ_1,\dots,ξ_n)$ of independent Rademacher random variables $ξ_1,\dots,ξ_n$. To what extent can $f(ξ_1,\dots,ξ_n)$ concentrate on a single point? This is the so-called polynomial Littlewood-Offord problem. A nearly optimal bound was proved by Meka, Nguyen and Vu: the point probabilities are always at most about $1/\sqrt n$, unless $f$ is "close to the zero polynomial" (having only $o(n^d)$ nonzero coefficients). In this paper we prove several results supporting the general philosophy that the Meka-Nguyen-Vu bound can be significantly improved unless $f$ is "close to a polynomial with special algebraic structure", drawing some comparisons to phenomena in analytic number theory. In particular, one of our results is a corrected version of a conjecture of Costello on multilinear forms (in an appendix with Ashwin Sah and Mehtaab Sawhney, we disprove Costello's original conjecture).
