Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Plug-and-Play Posterior Sampling for Blind Inverse Problems

Anqi Li, Weijie Gan, Ulugbek S. Kamilov

TL;DR

This work tackles blind inverse problems where the forward operator $A(\boldsymbol{\theta})$ is unknown. It introduces Blind-PnPDM, a framework that uses two diffusion-model priors for the image $x$ and the forward-model parameters $\boldsymbol{\theta}$ within a Gibbs sampling scheme to sample from the joint posterior $p(x,\boldsymbol{\theta}|y)$. The method decomposes each sampling step into likelihood and prior substeps, implemented with EDM-based diffusion priors and annealed coupling terms to promote robust convergence. Empirically, Blind-PnPDM achieves state-of-the-art results on blind image deblurring, outperforming several baselines in PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS while preserving fine textures, highlighting the practicality of joint diffusion-prior modeling for blind inverse problems.

Abstract

We introduce Blind Plug-and-Play Diffusion Models (Blind-PnPDM) as a novel framework for solving blind inverse problems where both the target image and the measurement operator are unknown. Unlike conventional methods that rely on explicit priors or separate parameter estimation, our approach performs posterior sampling by recasting the problem into an alternating Gaussian denoising scheme. We leverage two diffusion models as learned priors: one to capture the distribution of the target image and another to characterize the parameters of the measurement operator. This PnP integration of diffusion models ensures flexibility and ease of adaptation. Our experiments on blind image deblurring show that Blind-PnPDM outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of both quantitative metrics and visual fidelity. Our results highlight the effectiveness of treating blind inverse problems as a sequence of denoising subproblems while harnessing the expressive power of diffusion-based priors.

Plug-and-Play Posterior Sampling for Blind Inverse Problems

TL;DR

This work tackles blind inverse problems where the forward operator is unknown. It introduces Blind-PnPDM, a framework that uses two diffusion-model priors for the image and the forward-model parameters within a Gibbs sampling scheme to sample from the joint posterior . The method decomposes each sampling step into likelihood and prior substeps, implemented with EDM-based diffusion priors and annealed coupling terms to promote robust convergence. Empirically, Blind-PnPDM achieves state-of-the-art results on blind image deblurring, outperforming several baselines in PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS while preserving fine textures, highlighting the practicality of joint diffusion-prior modeling for blind inverse problems.

Abstract

We introduce Blind Plug-and-Play Diffusion Models (Blind-PnPDM) as a novel framework for solving blind inverse problems where both the target image and the measurement operator are unknown. Unlike conventional methods that rely on explicit priors or separate parameter estimation, our approach performs posterior sampling by recasting the problem into an alternating Gaussian denoising scheme. We leverage two diffusion models as learned priors: one to capture the distribution of the target image and another to characterize the parameters of the measurement operator. This PnP integration of diffusion models ensures flexibility and ease of adaptation. Our experiments on blind image deblurring show that Blind-PnPDM outperforms state-of-the-art methods in terms of both quantitative metrics and visual fidelity. Our results highlight the effectiveness of treating blind inverse problems as a sequence of denoising subproblems while harnessing the expressive power of diffusion-based priors.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 11 equations, 2 figures, 1 table, 1 algorithm.

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Illustration of the results obtained from several well-known methods for blind image deblurring with a motion kernel. The squares at the top of each image display the estimated kernels. The values in the top-left corner of each image indicate the PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS metrics for the corresponding method. This figure demonstrates that Blind-PnPDM can reconstruct both the image and the kernel with finer details and greater consistency with the ground truth compared to other baseline methods.
  • Figure 2: Illustration of the results obtained from several well-known methods for blind image deblurring with a Gaussian kernel. The squares at the top of each image display the estimated kernels. The values in the top-left corner of each image indicate the PSNR, SSIM, and LPIPS metrics for the corresponding method. Notably, Blind-PnPDM produces background details with finer textures, whereas other methods yield smoother results.