Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Symplectic Generative Networks (SGNs): A Hamiltonian Framework for Invertible Deep Generative Modeling

Agnideep Aich, Ashit Aich

TL;DR

Symplectic Generative Networks (SGNs) introduce a Hamiltonian-based, volume-preserving latent transport to enable exact likelihoods without Jacobian-determinant computations. By imposing a canonical symplectic structure on the latent space and discretizing dynamics with a stable leapfrog integrator, SGNs achieve ${|\det D\Phi_T(z)|=1}$, allowing an exact likelihood in SGN-Flow and a simplified ELBO in SGN-VAE. The work provides formal complexity advantages ${\mathcal{O}(T\cdot d)}$ over traditional normalizing flows, strengthened universal-approximation results for volume-preserving maps, and an information-geometric interpretation linking geodesics on statistical manifolds to SGN dynamics, along with a rigorous stability and backward-error analysis. It also extends to non-volume-preserving maps via a density-correction composition, and outlines a practical training algorithm, highlighting potential applications in physics-informed modeling and high-dimensional data generation. These results establish SGNs as a principled, efficient alternative to classical invertible models with strong theoretical guarantees and broad applicability.

Abstract

We introduce the \emph{Symplectic Generative Network (SGN)}, a deep generative model that leverages Hamiltonian mechanics to construct an invertible, volume-preserving mapping between a latent space and the data space. By endowing the latent space with a symplectic structure and modeling data generation as the time evolution of a Hamiltonian system, SGN achieves exact likelihood evaluation without incurring the computational overhead of Jacobian determinant calculations. In this work, we provide a rigorous mathematical foundation for SGNs through a comprehensive theoretical framework that includes: (i) complete proofs of invertibility and volume preservation, (ii) a formal complexity analysis with theoretical comparisons to Variational Autoencoders and Normalizing Flows, (iii) strengthened universal approximation results with quantitative error bounds, (iv) an information-theoretic analysis based on the geometry of statistical manifolds, and (v) an extensive stability analysis with adaptive integration guarantees. These contributions highlight the fundamental advantages of SGNs and establish a solid foundation for future empirical investigations and applications to complex, high-dimensional data.

Symplectic Generative Networks (SGNs): A Hamiltonian Framework for Invertible Deep Generative Modeling

TL;DR

Symplectic Generative Networks (SGNs) introduce a Hamiltonian-based, volume-preserving latent transport to enable exact likelihoods without Jacobian-determinant computations. By imposing a canonical symplectic structure on the latent space and discretizing dynamics with a stable leapfrog integrator, SGNs achieve , allowing an exact likelihood in SGN-Flow and a simplified ELBO in SGN-VAE. The work provides formal complexity advantages over traditional normalizing flows, strengthened universal-approximation results for volume-preserving maps, and an information-geometric interpretation linking geodesics on statistical manifolds to SGN dynamics, along with a rigorous stability and backward-error analysis. It also extends to non-volume-preserving maps via a density-correction composition, and outlines a practical training algorithm, highlighting potential applications in physics-informed modeling and high-dimensional data generation. These results establish SGNs as a principled, efficient alternative to classical invertible models with strong theoretical guarantees and broad applicability.

Abstract

We introduce the \emph{Symplectic Generative Network (SGN)}, a deep generative model that leverages Hamiltonian mechanics to construct an invertible, volume-preserving mapping between a latent space and the data space. By endowing the latent space with a symplectic structure and modeling data generation as the time evolution of a Hamiltonian system, SGN achieves exact likelihood evaluation without incurring the computational overhead of Jacobian determinant calculations. In this work, we provide a rigorous mathematical foundation for SGNs through a comprehensive theoretical framework that includes: (i) complete proofs of invertibility and volume preservation, (ii) a formal complexity analysis with theoretical comparisons to Variational Autoencoders and Normalizing Flows, (iii) strengthened universal approximation results with quantitative error bounds, (iv) an information-theoretic analysis based on the geometry of statistical manifolds, and (v) an extensive stability analysis with adaptive integration guarantees. These contributions highlight the fundamental advantages of SGNs and establish a solid foundation for future empirical investigations and applications to complex, high-dimensional data.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 36 sections, 24 theorems, 141 equations, 4 figures, 1 algorithm.

Key Result

Theorem 4.1

Let $\Phi_T:\mathbb{R}^{2d}\to\mathbb{R}^{2d}$ be the flow obtained by integrating eq:hamilton using a symplectic integrator with step size $\Delta t$ over $T$ steps. Then, $\Phi_T$ is invertible and volume preserving:

Figures (4)

  • Figure 1: Hamiltonian dynamics in phase space. Concentric blue curves are constant energy; the red curve shows the flow.
  • Figure 2: Leapfrog integration used in SGNs.
  • Figure 3: SGN pipeline: encoder $\to$ symplectic flow $\to$ decoder. The flow is volume-preserving, so only the terminal mapping contributes a Jacobian term.
  • Figure 4: Information Geometry on Statistical Manifolds. The ellipse represents a statistical manifold endowed with the Fisher-Rao metric, while the two curves illustrate a geodesic and a Hamiltonian flow between two points.

Theorems & Definitions (49)

  • Theorem 4.1: Symplecticity and Volume Preservation
  • proof
  • Theorem 5.1: Complexity Advantage of SGNs
  • proof
  • Proposition 5.2: Memory Complexity
  • proof
  • Theorem 5.3: Expressivity Comparison
  • proof
  • Proposition 5.4: Approximation Rate Comparison
  • proof
  • ...and 39 more