Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Hyperbolic Monge-Ampère systems with $S_1=0$

Yuhao Hu

TL;DR

This work analyzes hyperbolic Monge–Ampère systems on a 5-manifold through the Cartan–BGG invariant tensors $S_1$ and $S_2$. It proves that in the $S_1=0$ regime, $S_2$ must be degenerate, reducing to a rank-1 normal form with two relative invariants $Q_1,Q_2$ and three subcases I–III, whose local generalities are governed by 1 or 2 arbitrary functions of 3 variables. Notably, Case I yields a linear Monge–Ampère PDE with an explicit associated 3D geometry, while Case II and Case III exhibit progressively fewer symmetries and higher cohomogeneity, with Case II giving 1 function of 3 variables and Case III giving 2 such functions. A symmetry analysis shows that high symmetry occurs only in Case I, and the paper provides a mechanism to lift associated-geometry symmetries to the full Monge–Ampère system. Collectively, the results map the landscape of S1=0 hyperbolic Monge–Ampère systems, contrasting them with the Euler–Lagrange class and highlighting how invariant geometry constrains local generality and linearity aspects.

Abstract

For hyperbolic Monge-Ampère systems, a well-known solution of the equivalence problem yields two invariant tensors, ${S}_1$ and ${S}_2$, defined on the underlying $5$-manifold, where ${S}_2=0$ characterizes systems that are Euler-Lagrange. In this article, we consider the `opposite' case, ${S}_1 = 0$, and show that the local generality of such systems is `$2$ arbitrary functions of $3$ variables'. In addition, we classify all $S_1=0$ systems with cohomogeneity at most one, which turn out to be linear up to contact transformations.

Hyperbolic Monge-Ampère systems with $S_1=0$

TL;DR

This work analyzes hyperbolic Monge–Ampère systems on a 5-manifold through the Cartan–BGG invariant tensors and . It proves that in the regime, must be degenerate, reducing to a rank-1 normal form with two relative invariants and three subcases I–III, whose local generalities are governed by 1 or 2 arbitrary functions of 3 variables. Notably, Case I yields a linear Monge–Ampère PDE with an explicit associated 3D geometry, while Case II and Case III exhibit progressively fewer symmetries and higher cohomogeneity, with Case II giving 1 function of 3 variables and Case III giving 2 such functions. A symmetry analysis shows that high symmetry occurs only in Case I, and the paper provides a mechanism to lift associated-geometry symmetries to the full Monge–Ampère system. Collectively, the results map the landscape of S1=0 hyperbolic Monge–Ampère systems, contrasting them with the Euler–Lagrange class and highlighting how invariant geometry constrains local generality and linearity aspects.

Abstract

For hyperbolic Monge-Ampère systems, a well-known solution of the equivalence problem yields two invariant tensors, and , defined on the underlying -manifold, where characterizes systems that are Euler-Lagrange. In this article, we consider the `opposite' case, , and show that the local generality of such systems is ` arbitrary functions of variables'. In addition, we classify all systems with cohomogeneity at most one, which turn out to be linear up to contact transformations.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 25 sections, 17 theorems, 181 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2.3

Given a hyperbolic Monge--Ampère system $(M^5,\mathcal{E})$ and any $x\in M$, there exists a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ and a coframe field $(\omega^0,\omega^1,\ldots,\omega^4)$ defined on $U$ such that $\mathcal{E} = \langle\omega^0,\omega^1\wedge\omega^2,\omega^3\wedge\omega^4\rangle_{{\rm alg}}$ and for some functions $V_1,\ldots, V_8$ and $1$-forms $\phi_i$$(i = 0,\ldots,8)$ satisfying $\phi_0 =

Theorems & Definitions (38)

  • Definition 2.1: BGG
  • Definition 2.1: BGG
  • Definition 2.2
  • Theorem 2.3: BGG
  • Proposition 3.1
  • Proposition 3.2
  • proof
  • Theorem 3.3
  • Claim 4.1
  • proof
  • ...and 28 more