Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Preventing Adversarial AI Attacks Against Autonomous Situational Awareness: A Maritime Case Study

Mathew J. Walter, Aaron Barrett, Kimberly Tam

TL;DR

This work tackles adversarial AI threats in maritime autonomous systems by introducing the Data Fusion Cyber Resilience (DFCR) method, which leverages multi-input data fusion (AIS, radar, optical) and a novel security-oriented confidence metric. The approach strengthens defence-in-depth through defensive components that validate, cross-check, and re-score detections, rather than relying on single-model sanitisation. Real-world sea trials and controlled experiments demonstrate that DFCR substantially reduces loss under a range of attacks, including perturbations, adversarial patches, and spoofing, while maintaining benign detection performance. The results suggest DFCR offers a practical pathway to secure and resilient AI-driven MAS operations with operator-facing risk signaling and scalable applicability beyond maritime domains.

Abstract

Adversarial artificial intelligence (AI) attacks pose a significant threat to autonomous transportation, such as maritime vessels, that rely on AI components. Malicious actors can exploit these systems to deceive and manipulate AI-driven operations. This paper addresses three critical research challenges associated with adversarial AI: the limited scope of traditional defences, inadequate security metrics, and the need to build resilience beyond model-level defences. To address these challenges, we propose building defences utilising multiple inputs and data fusion to create defensive components and an AI security metric as a novel approach toward developing more secure AI systems. We name this approach the Data Fusion Cyber Resilience (DFCR) method, and we evaluate it through real-world demonstrations and comprehensive quantitative analyses, comparing a system built with the DFCR method against single-input models and models utilising existing state-of-the-art defences. The findings show that the DFCR approach significantly enhances resilience against adversarial machine learning attacks in maritime autonomous system operations, achieving up to a 35\% reduction in loss for successful multi-pronged perturbation attacks, up to a 100\% reduction in loss for successful adversarial patch attacks and up to 100\% reduction in loss for successful spoofing attacks when using these more resilient systems. We demonstrate how DFCR and DFCR confidence scores can reduce adversarial AI contact confidence and improve decision-making by the system, even when typical adversarial defences have been compromised. Ultimately, this work contributes to the development of more secure and resilient AI-driven systems against adversarial attacks.

Preventing Adversarial AI Attacks Against Autonomous Situational Awareness: A Maritime Case Study

TL;DR

This work tackles adversarial AI threats in maritime autonomous systems by introducing the Data Fusion Cyber Resilience (DFCR) method, which leverages multi-input data fusion (AIS, radar, optical) and a novel security-oriented confidence metric. The approach strengthens defence-in-depth through defensive components that validate, cross-check, and re-score detections, rather than relying on single-model sanitisation. Real-world sea trials and controlled experiments demonstrate that DFCR substantially reduces loss under a range of attacks, including perturbations, adversarial patches, and spoofing, while maintaining benign detection performance. The results suggest DFCR offers a practical pathway to secure and resilient AI-driven MAS operations with operator-facing risk signaling and scalable applicability beyond maritime domains.

Abstract

Adversarial artificial intelligence (AI) attacks pose a significant threat to autonomous transportation, such as maritime vessels, that rely on AI components. Malicious actors can exploit these systems to deceive and manipulate AI-driven operations. This paper addresses three critical research challenges associated with adversarial AI: the limited scope of traditional defences, inadequate security metrics, and the need to build resilience beyond model-level defences. To address these challenges, we propose building defences utilising multiple inputs and data fusion to create defensive components and an AI security metric as a novel approach toward developing more secure AI systems. We name this approach the Data Fusion Cyber Resilience (DFCR) method, and we evaluate it through real-world demonstrations and comprehensive quantitative analyses, comparing a system built with the DFCR method against single-input models and models utilising existing state-of-the-art defences. The findings show that the DFCR approach significantly enhances resilience against adversarial machine learning attacks in maritime autonomous system operations, achieving up to a 35\% reduction in loss for successful multi-pronged perturbation attacks, up to a 100\% reduction in loss for successful adversarial patch attacks and up to 100\% reduction in loss for successful spoofing attacks when using these more resilient systems. We demonstrate how DFCR and DFCR confidence scores can reduce adversarial AI contact confidence and improve decision-making by the system, even when typical adversarial defences have been compromised. Ultimately, this work contributes to the development of more secure and resilient AI-driven systems against adversarial attacks.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 25 sections, 12 equations, 7 figures, 5 tables, 1 algorithm.

Figures (7)

  • Figure 1: The DFCR system topology shows the defensive components and DFCR confidence output.
  • Figure 2: Comparison of radar contacts in different coordinate spaces. (a) shows the true radar contact in the AIS and radar space, while (b) shows the radar contact transformed into the optical space using the homography mapping.
  • Figure 3: The image shows AIS, radar, and optical spaces. A well-verified contact can be seen in both spaces, and this is reflected in improved DFCR confidence scores.
  • Figure 4: The USV Bauza.
  • Figure 5: Elevated $y-$values (raw confidence values) correspond to superior detection capabilities, as all detections are genuine.
  • ...and 2 more figures