Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Quasi-strongly regular graphs on the flags of symmetric designs

Eugenia O'Reilly-Regueiro, Octavio B. Zapata-Fonseca

TL;DR

The article defines two flag-graphs, Γ1(D) for general BIBDs and Γ2(D) for biplanes, and proves Γ1(D) is an almost-quasi-strongly regular graph with parameters dictated by the BIBD’s λ and symmetry. It establishes that design isomorphism is equivalent to flag-graph isomorphism for Γ1(D) and Γ2(D), and provides explicit spectral characterizations: Γ1(D) has a detailed eigenvalue structure depending on (v,b,r,k,λ) and, in the symmetric case, reduces to a QSRG with concrete parameters; Γ2(D) is likewise a QSRG with its own parameterization. The paper also computes spectra for known small biplanes, highlighting instances where the flag-graphs are determined by spectrum and cases where cospectral but non-isomorphic graphs arise, thereby advancing understanding of spectral characterizations in flag-based graph constructions. These results bridge combinatorial design theory with spectral graph theory, offering tools for identifying and distinguishing designs via their associated flag-graphs.

Abstract

This paper was inspired by a paper by Blokhuis and Brouwer [Designs, Codes and Cryptography 65, 2012] in which a definition of a graph on the flags of a biplane is given, and they prove that the graph corresponding to the unique $(11,5,2)$-biplane is determined by its spectrum. It is also inspired by the different definition of flag-graph seen in the context of maps and abstract polytopes. Here we use this definition for $(v,k,λ)$-BIBDs, and prove that if the design is symmetric then the graph is quasi-strongly regular. We will also use the definition given by Blokhuis and Brouwer for the case of biplanes and prove that this too, is a QSRG, (with different parameters). We investigate whether these graphs are determined by their spectra for some of the known biplanes.

Quasi-strongly regular graphs on the flags of symmetric designs

TL;DR

The article defines two flag-graphs, Γ1(D) for general BIBDs and Γ2(D) for biplanes, and proves Γ1(D) is an almost-quasi-strongly regular graph with parameters dictated by the BIBD’s λ and symmetry. It establishes that design isomorphism is equivalent to flag-graph isomorphism for Γ1(D) and Γ2(D), and provides explicit spectral characterizations: Γ1(D) has a detailed eigenvalue structure depending on (v,b,r,k,λ) and, in the symmetric case, reduces to a QSRG with concrete parameters; Γ2(D) is likewise a QSRG with its own parameterization. The paper also computes spectra for known small biplanes, highlighting instances where the flag-graphs are determined by spectrum and cases where cospectral but non-isomorphic graphs arise, thereby advancing understanding of spectral characterizations in flag-based graph constructions. These results bridge combinatorial design theory with spectral graph theory, offering tools for identifying and distinguishing designs via their associated flag-graphs.

Abstract

This paper was inspired by a paper by Blokhuis and Brouwer [Designs, Codes and Cryptography 65, 2012] in which a definition of a graph on the flags of a biplane is given, and they prove that the graph corresponding to the unique -biplane is determined by its spectrum. It is also inspired by the different definition of flag-graph seen in the context of maps and abstract polytopes. Here we use this definition for -BIBDs, and prove that if the design is symmetric then the graph is quasi-strongly regular. We will also use the definition given by Blokhuis and Brouwer for the case of biplanes and prove that this too, is a QSRG, (with different parameters). We investigate whether these graphs are determined by their spectra for some of the known biplanes.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 13 theorems, 11 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $D=(P,\mathcal{B})$ be a non-trivial $(v,b,r,k,\lambda)$-BIBD, and the flag-graph of $D$, $\Gamma_1(D)$ as defined above. Then one of the following holds:

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Theorem : see Theorem \ref{['t1']} below
  • Corollary : Corollary \ref{['c1']}
  • Theorem : Theorem \ref{['t3']}
  • Theorem : Theorem \ref{['t4']}
  • Theorem : Theorem \ref{['thm:iso2']}
  • Definition 1
  • Theorem 1
  • Corollary 1
  • proof
  • Corollary 2
  • ...and 11 more