Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Least Squares Model Reduction: A Two-Stage System-Theoretic Interpretation

Alberto Padoan

TL;DR

For linear time-invariant systems with transfer function $W(s)=C(sI-A)^{-1}B$, the paper reframes least-squares moment matching as a two-stage procedure: first build a surrogate that exactly enforces interpolation constraints, then project to a reduced-order model. This system-theoretic view leverages output regulation theory and Krylov projections to connect LS moment matching with Sylvester-equation and projection-based realizations, and it revisits the Smith–Lucas LS method as a natural instance within this framework. The main contributions are: (i) a unified two-step interpretation that links classical MM and LS MM methods, (ii) a characterization of LS MM through a constrained optimization problem, and (iii) a clear structure showing how zero-interpolation cases (Smith–Lucas) fit into the surrogate-two-step paradigm. The framework clarifies the design space for LS MM and paves the way for extending the approach to nonlinear and time-varying settings while preserving key interpolatory properties.

Abstract

Model reduction simplifies complex dynamical systems while preserving essential properties. This paper revisits a recently proposed system-theoretic framework for least squares moment matching. It interprets least squares model reduction in terms of two steps process: constructing a surrogate model to satisfy interpolation constraints, then projecting it onto a reduced-order space. Using tools from output regulation theory and Krylov projections, this approach provides a new view on classical methods. For illustration, we reexamine the least-squares model reduction method by Lucas and Smith, offering new insights into its structure.

Least Squares Model Reduction: A Two-Stage System-Theoretic Interpretation

TL;DR

For linear time-invariant systems with transfer function , the paper reframes least-squares moment matching as a two-stage procedure: first build a surrogate that exactly enforces interpolation constraints, then project to a reduced-order model. This system-theoretic view leverages output regulation theory and Krylov projections to connect LS moment matching with Sylvester-equation and projection-based realizations, and it revisits the Smith–Lucas LS method as a natural instance within this framework. The main contributions are: (i) a unified two-step interpretation that links classical MM and LS MM methods, (ii) a characterization of LS MM through a constrained optimization problem, and (iii) a clear structure showing how zero-interpolation cases (Smith–Lucas) fit into the surrogate-two-step paradigm. The framework clarifies the design space for LS MM and paves the way for extending the approach to nonlinear and time-varying settings while preserving key interpolatory properties.

Abstract

Model reduction simplifies complex dynamical systems while preserving essential properties. This paper revisits a recently proposed system-theoretic framework for least squares moment matching. It interprets least squares model reduction in terms of two steps process: constructing a surrogate model to satisfy interpolation constraints, then projecting it onto a reduced-order space. Using tools from output regulation theory and Krylov projections, this approach provides a new view on classical methods. For illustration, we reexamine the least-squares model reduction method by Lucas and Smith, offering new insights into its structure.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 13 sections, 6 theorems, 29 equations, 2 figures, 1 table.

Key Result

lemma 1

astolfi2010model Consider system eq:system-linear. Suppose Assumptions ass:minimality and ass:signal-generator-linear hold. Then there is a non-singular matrix ${T\in\mathbb{R}^{\nu\times \nu}}$ such that where ${\Pi \in \mathbb{R}^{n\times \nu}}$ is the solution of the Sylvester equation

Figures (2)

  • Figure 1: Least squares model reduction by moment matching as a two-step process using surrogate models.
  • Figure 2: Least squares model reduction by moment matching as a two-step process using surrogate signal generators.

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • lemma 1
  • theorem 1
  • theorem 2
  • theorem 3
  • theorem 4
  • theorem 5
  • proof