Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Proof of a Conjecture on the Growth of the Maximal Resistance Distance in a Linear 3--Tree

Emily J. Evans, Russell Jay Hendel

TL;DR

The paper addresses the conjecture on the asymptotic growth of the maximal resistance distance in straight linear 3-trees by developing a determinant-based Laplace-expansion framework for deleted Laplacian matrices. It derives recurrences for determinant families, obtains a Binet-form closed expression, and yields an exact closed form for the resistance distance $R(n)$ as a ratio of exponential terms in roots $r_i$, establishing that $R(n+1)-R(n) \to 1/14$ with geometric convergence of the error terms. The dominant root governs the asymptotics, while secondary roots contribute to the error, which is controlled via stable “sister” sequences. The method not only proves the conjecture but also provides a potentially general tool for computing resistance distances in other nearly banded graph families.

Abstract

Barret, Evans, and Francis conjectured that if $G$ is the straight linear 3-tree with $n$ vertices and $H$ is the straight linear 3-tree with $n+1$ vertices then \[\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} r_{H} (1, n+1) - r_G(1,n) = \frac{1}{14},\] where $r_G(u,v)$ and $r_H(u,v)$ are the resistance distance between vertices $u$ and $v$ in graphs $G$ and $H$ respectively. In this paper, we prove the conjecture by looking at the determinants of deleted Laplacian matrices. The proof uses a Laplace expansion method on a family of determinants to determine the underlying recursion this family satisfies and then uses routine linear algebra methods to obtain an exact Binet formula for the $n$-th term.

Proof of a Conjecture on the Growth of the Maximal Resistance Distance in a Linear 3--Tree

TL;DR

The paper addresses the conjecture on the asymptotic growth of the maximal resistance distance in straight linear 3-trees by developing a determinant-based Laplace-expansion framework for deleted Laplacian matrices. It derives recurrences for determinant families, obtains a Binet-form closed expression, and yields an exact closed form for the resistance distance as a ratio of exponential terms in roots , establishing that with geometric convergence of the error terms. The dominant root governs the asymptotics, while secondary roots contribute to the error, which is controlled via stable “sister” sequences. The method not only proves the conjecture but also provides a potentially general tool for computing resistance distances in other nearly banded graph families.

Abstract

Barret, Evans, and Francis conjectured that if is the straight linear 3-tree with vertices and is the straight linear 3-tree with vertices then where and are the resistance distance between vertices and in graphs and respectively. In this paper, we prove the conjecture by looking at the determinants of deleted Laplacian matrices. The proof uses a Laplace expansion method on a family of determinants to determine the underlying recursion this family satisfies and then uses routine linear algebra methods to obtain an exact Binet formula for the -th term.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 7 sections, 2 theorems, 24 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 2

A system of $n \ge 1$ identities in families of determinants, with the $a_{i,j}$ integer polynomials in a variable $y$ may be solved, that is, may be reduced to a single identity in one matrix family.

Theorems & Definitions (7)

  • Example 1
  • Theorem 2
  • proof
  • Remark 3
  • Proposition 4
  • proof
  • Remark 5