Bounding Width on Graph Classes of Constant Diameter
Konrad K. Dabrowski, Tala Eagling-Vose, Noleen Köhler, Sebastian Ordyniak, Daniël Paulusma
TL;DR
This work investigates how bounding the diameter of a graph class with initially unbounded width affects treedepth, pathwidth, treewidth, and clique-width under induced-subgraph, subgraph, and minor containment. The authors provide dichotomies and classifications, notably proving a complete treedepth dichotomy for $F$-subgraph-free graphs when the diameter $d \ge 5$ (and for $d=4$ with an additional exception) and presenting substantial partial results for $d=2,3$. They extend the analysis to the minor and induced-subgraph relations, establish diameter-based dichotomies for treewidth and clique-width, and develop intricate constructions (e.g., polarity graphs, subdivided stars, V- and E-type webs) to demonstrate boundedness or unboundedness. The findings highlight that diameter constraints can dramatically alter the width behavior of graph classes, with significant algorithmic implications via meta-theorems, and they outline several open problems and conjectures for completing the classifications in the unresolved cases.
Abstract
We determine if the width of a graph class ${\cal G}$ changes from unbounded to bounded if we consider only those graphs from ${\cal G}$ whose diameter is bounded. As parameters we consider treedepth, pathwidth, treewidth and clique-width, and as graph classes we consider classes defined by forbidding some specific graph $F$ as a minor, induced subgraph or subgraph, respectively. Our main focus is on treedepth for $F$-subgraph-free graphs of diameter at most~$d$ for some fixed integer $d$. We give classifications of boundedness of treedepth for $d\in \{4,5,\ldots\}$ and partial classifications for $d=2$ and $d=3$.
