Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the weak $k$-metric dimension of Hamming graphs

Elena Fernandez, Sandi Klavzar, Dorota Kuziak, Manuel Muñoz-Marquez, Ismael G. Yero

TL;DR

The paper determines the weak $k$-metric dimension of the two-dimensional Hamming graph $K_n\square K_n$ for all feasible $k$ with $n\ge 3$, delivering a closed-form, piecewise formula that depends on the parity and size of $k$. It provides constructions and lower-bound arguments across cases $k=2$, $k=3$, and $4\le k\le 2n$, culminating in $\operatorname{wdim}_2(K_n\square K_n)=\lceil 4n/3\rceil$, $\operatorname{wdim}_3(K_n\square K_n)=2n$, and, for even $k$ or $k=3$, $\operatorname{wdim}_k(K_n\square K_n)=n\lceil k/2\rceil$, with the odd-$k\ge5$ case giving $n\lceil k/2\rceil-1$. The authors develop and compare ILP formulations, notably a layered model $F_{gh}$, to efficiently compute $\operatorname{wdim}_k(G)$ for $K_n\square K_m$, and their computational experiments corroborate the theoretical results and support broader conjectures for higher-dimensional Hamming graphs. The work advances understanding of weak metric dimensions in Cartesian/Hamming graphs and points to future extensions to $d$-dimensional cases and hypercube graphs.

Abstract

Given a connected graph $G$, a set of vertices $X\subset V(G)$ is a weak $k$-resolving set of $G$ if for each two vertices $y,z\in V(G)$, the sum of the values $|d_G(y,x)-d_G(z,x)|$ over all $x\in X$ is at least $k$, where $d_G(u,v)$ stands for the length of a shortest path between $u$ and $v$. The cardinality of a smallest weak $k$-resolving set of $G$ is the weak $k$-metric dimension of $G$, and is denoted by $\mathrm{wdim}_k(G)$. In this paper, $\mathrm{wdim}_k(K_n\,\square\,K_n)$ is determined for every $n\ge 3$ and every $2\le k\le 2n$. An improvement of a known integer linear programming formulation for this problem is developed and implemented for the graphs $K_n\,\square\,K_m$. Conjectures regarding these general situations are posed.

On the weak $k$-metric dimension of Hamming graphs

TL;DR

The paper determines the weak -metric dimension of the two-dimensional Hamming graph for all feasible with , delivering a closed-form, piecewise formula that depends on the parity and size of . It provides constructions and lower-bound arguments across cases , , and , culminating in , , and, for even or , , with the odd- case giving . The authors develop and compare ILP formulations, notably a layered model , to efficiently compute for , and their computational experiments corroborate the theoretical results and support broader conjectures for higher-dimensional Hamming graphs. The work advances understanding of weak metric dimensions in Cartesian/Hamming graphs and points to future extensions to -dimensional cases and hypercube graphs.

Abstract

Given a connected graph , a set of vertices is a weak -resolving set of if for each two vertices , the sum of the values over all is at least , where stands for the length of a shortest path between and . The cardinality of a smallest weak -resolving set of is the weak -metric dimension of , and is denoted by . In this paper, is determined for every and every . An improvement of a known integer linear programming formulation for this problem is developed and implemented for the graphs . Conjectures regarding these general situations are posed.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 9 sections, 6 theorems, 41 equations, 3 figures, 4 tables.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

If $n\ge 3$ and $2\le k\le 2n$, then

Figures (3)

  • Figure 1: The sets (in bold) $X_1$ (a weak $10$-metric basis), $X_2$ (a weak $8$-metric basis), $X_3$ (a weak $6$-metric basis) and $X_4$ (a weak $4$-metric basis), respectively, in $K_6\,\square\, K_6$
  • Figure 2: The sets $Y_6$, $Y_7$, and $Y_8$ respectively in $K_6\,\square\, K_6$, $K_7\,\square\, K_7$, and $K_8\,\square\, K_8$
  • Figure 3: Definition of sets $I_{uv}$, $I_{u\tilde{v}}$, and $I_{u\tilde{u}}$

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Proposition 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Proposition 4.1
  • proof
  • Proposition 4.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 4.3