Large Language Model-Empowered Interactive Load Forecasting
Yu Zuo, Dalin Qin, Yi Wang
TL;DR
The paper addresses the need for human-in-the-loop load forecasting by introducing an LLM-powered multi-agent framework that orchestrates the entire forecasting pipeline. It combines a Task Manager, Preparation Assistant, Model Manager, Model Developer, and Deployment Operator to enable natural-language interaction and stage-wise control, guided by an interactive Bayesian optimization loop. The approach yields improved forecasting accuracy when users contribute insights and shows feasible token-based costs for real-world deployment. This framework has practical implications for power-system operators, offering an adaptable, interpretable, and cost-conscious path to integrating advanced forecasting methods with domain expertise. Future work aims to enhance memory efficiency and provide explainable AI capabilities to further boost trust and adoption.
Abstract
The growing complexity of power systems has made accurate load forecasting more important than ever. An increasing number of advanced load forecasting methods have been developed. However, the static design of current methods offers no mechanism for human-model interaction. As the primary users of forecasting models, system operators often find it difficult to understand and apply these advanced models, which typically requires expertise in artificial intelligence (AI). This also prevents them from incorporating their experience and real-world contextual understanding into the forecasting process. Recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) offer a new opportunity to address this issue. By leveraging their natural language understanding and reasoning capabilities, we propose an LLM-based multi-agent collaboration framework to bridge the gap between human operators and forecasting models. A set of specialized agents is designed to perform different tasks in the forecasting workflow and collaborate via a dedicated communication mechanism. This framework embeds interactive mechanisms throughout the load forecasting pipeline, reducing the technical threshold for non-expert users and enabling the integration of human experience. Our experiments demonstrate that the interactive load forecasting accuracy can be significantly improved when users provide proper insight in key stages. Our cost analysis shows that the framework remains affordable, making it practical for real-world deployment.
