How Managers Perceive AI-Assisted Conversational Training for Workplace Communication
Lance T. Wilhelm, Xiaohan Ding, Kirk McInnis Knutsen, Buse Carik, Eugenia H. Rho
TL;DR
This work investigates how managers perceive AI-assisted training for workplace communication and uses a functional probe, CommCoach, to elicit design requirements. By combining a formative study with a three-phase user study of 17 managers, the authors identify core design tensions and opportunities around customization, in-situ feedback, and human-AI collaboration. The contributions include design implications for AI-mediated managerial training and the CommCoach prototype itself as a platform to explore reflective learning in leadership development. The findings highlight that scalable AI tooling must balance personalization, realism, and bias considerations while complementing human mentorship to be effective in organizational contexts.
Abstract
Effective workplace communication is essential for managerial success, yet many managers lack access to tailored and sustained training. Although AI-assisted communication systems may offer scalable training solutions, little is known about how managers envision the role of AI in helping them improve their communication skills. To investigate this, we designed a conversational role-play system, CommCoach, as a functional probe to understand how managers anticipate using AI to practice their communication skills. Through semi-structured interviews, participants emphasized the value of adaptive, low-risk simulations for practicing difficult workplace conversations. They also highlighted opportunities, including human-AI teaming, transparent and context-aware feedback, and greater control over AI-generated personas. AI-assisted communication training should balance personalization, structured learning objectives, and adaptability to different user styles and contexts. However, achieving this requires carefully navigating tensions between adaptive and consistent AI feedback, realism and potential bias, and the open-ended nature of AI conversations versus structured workplace discourse.
