Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Rainbow Turán problems for a matching and any other graph

Dániel Gerbner, Shujing Miao

TL;DR

This work develops a rainbow Turán framework for collections of graphs on a common vertex set, focusing on maximizing edge resources while avoiding rainbow copies of a forbidden family ${F, M_{s+1}}$. It introduces three extremal parameters $\mathrm{ex}_t(n,{\mathcal{F}})$, $\mathrm{ex}_t^{\sum}(n,{\mathcal{F}})$, and $\mathrm{ex}_t^{\prod}(n,{\mathcal{F}})$ and derives exact or asymptotic formulas for ${\mathcal{F}}=\{F, M_{s+1}\}$ across four regimes determined by the bipartiteness of $F$ and the color-covering parameter $p(F)$. The proof strategy combines greedy rainbow-extension arguments, a nesting reduction to structured colorings, and Hall-type arguments via an auxiliary color-vertex graph to bound the sum and product quantities, yielding explicit constructions and tight bounds. The results extend rainbow Turán-type theory beyond triangles to general $F$, clarifying how matching constraints interact with forbidden subgraphs and revealing when rainbow-extremal configurations are compositions of complete-graph colors and balanced bipartite blocks. Overall, the paper provides a cohesive, extensible toolkit for multicolor extremal problems with rainbow restrictions and connects to Erdős–Sós-type questions in the bipartite and tree regimes.

Abstract

For a family of graphs $\cF$, a graph is called $\cF$-free if it does not contain any member of $\cF$ as a subgraph. Given a collection of graphs $(G_1,\ldots,G_t)$ on the same vertex set $V$ of size $n$, a rainbow graph on $V$ is obtained by taking at most one edge from each $G_i$. We say that a collection is rainbow $\cF$-free if it contains no rainbow copy of any member of $\cF$. In this paper, we study the maximum values of $min_{i\in [t]}|E(G_i)|$, $\sum_{i=1}^{t}|E(G_i)|$ and $\prod_{i=1}^{t}|E(G_i)|$ among rainbow $\{F,M_{s+1}\}$-free collections $(G_1,\ldots,G_t)$ on $n$ vertices.

Rainbow Turán problems for a matching and any other graph

TL;DR

This work develops a rainbow Turán framework for collections of graphs on a common vertex set, focusing on maximizing edge resources while avoiding rainbow copies of a forbidden family . It introduces three extremal parameters , , and and derives exact or asymptotic formulas for across four regimes determined by the bipartiteness of and the color-covering parameter . The proof strategy combines greedy rainbow-extension arguments, a nesting reduction to structured colorings, and Hall-type arguments via an auxiliary color-vertex graph to bound the sum and product quantities, yielding explicit constructions and tight bounds. The results extend rainbow Turán-type theory beyond triangles to general , clarifying how matching constraints interact with forbidden subgraphs and revealing when rainbow-extremal configurations are compositions of complete-graph colors and balanced bipartite blocks. Overall, the paper provides a cohesive, extensible toolkit for multicolor extremal problems with rainbow restrictions and connects to Erdős–Sós-type questions in the bipartite and tree regimes.

Abstract

For a family of graphs , a graph is called -free if it does not contain any member of as a subgraph. Given a collection of graphs on the same vertex set of size , a rainbow graph on is obtained by taking at most one edge from each . We say that a collection is rainbow -free if it contains no rainbow copy of any member of . In this paper, we study the maximum values of , and among rainbow -free collections on vertices.

Paper Structure

This paper contains 4 sections, 14 theorems, 5 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $t\ge\max\{|E(F)|,s+1\}$. (i) If $F$ is not bipartite and $n$ is sufficiently large, then $\mathrm{ex}_t(n,\{F,M_{s+1}\})=s(n-s)+\mathrm{ex}_t(s,{\mathcal{F}}(F))$. (ii) If $F$ is bipartite and $p(F)>s$, then $\mathrm{ex}_t(n,\{F,M_{s+1}\})=s(n-s)+ex_t(s,\mathcal{F}[s])$. (iii) If $F$ is biparti

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Proposition 2.1: Meshulam
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • ...and 16 more