Noise Injection Systemically Degrades Large Language Model Safety Guardrails
Prithviraj Singh Shahani, Kaveh Eskandari Miandoab, Matthias Scheutz
TL;DR
This study examines the robustness of safety guardrails in open-weight LLMs by injecting zero-mean Gaussian noise into activations during inference, revealing systemic brittleness of post-hoc safety fine-tuning across multiple model families. The authors conduct three experiments (guardrail robustness, math-reasoning under noise, and noise-based safety-tuning) using datasets such as the harmful-instruction corpus and GSM8K, and evaluate with automated safety classifiers. Key findings show that activation noise increases harmful outputs across models (with $p<0.001$ and large effect sizes), that deeper safety fine-tuning does not reliably improve resilience, and that RL-based post-training (as in Qwen2.5) yields notably stronger robustness. Noise-tuned safety training offers localized improvements within training noise ranges but does not generalize to higher perturbations, underscoring the need for deeper, more integrated safety mechanisms that resist internal perturbations in real-world deployment.
Abstract
Safety guardrails in large language models (LLMs) are a critical component in preventing harmful outputs. Yet, their resilience under perturbation remains poorly understood. In this paper, we investigate the robustness of safety fine-tuning in LLMs by systematically injecting Gaussian noise into model activations. We show across multiple open-weight models that (1) Gaussian noise raises harmful-output rates (p < 0.001) by up to 27%, (2) that deeper safety fine-tuning affords no extra protection, and (3) that chain-of-thought reasoning remains largely intact. The findings reveal critical vulnerabilities in current safety alignment techniques and highlight the potential of reasoning-based and reinforcement learning approaches as promising direction for developing more robust AI safety systems. These results have important implications for real-world deployment of LLMs in safety-critical applications as these results imply that widely-deployed safety tuning methods can fail even without adversarial prompts.
