Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On the bilinear cone multiplier

Saurabh Shrivastava, Kalachand Shuin

TL;DR

This work analyzes the pointwise convergence of the bilinear cone multiplier ${ m T}^{\,oldsymbol{\lambda}}_{R}$ as $R o\infty$ for functions in $L^{p_1} imes L^{p_2}$, establishing convergence to the product $f g$ under explicit threshold conditions on $oldsymbol{\lambda}$ governed by the exponents $p_1,p_2,p$. The authors reduce the problem to proving weighted $L^{2} imes L^{2} o L^{1}$ estimates for the maximal operator ${ m T}^{oldsymbol{\lambda}}_{*}$ via a detailed multiplier decomposition and a bilinear, Stein–Weiss–type representation, building on square-function and maximal-function techniques from CHLY and related works. Key contributions include a robust decomposition of the bilinear cone multiplier into $j eq 1$ and $j=1$ components, precise weighted $L^{2}$ bounds for associated square-functions and maximal operators, and a direct appendix confirming the essential $L^{2} imes L^{2} o L^{1}$ boundedness. The results extend pointwise convergence theory to bilinear cone multipliers and illustrate how weighted bilinear estimates underpin almost everywhere convergence in higher dimensions. These methods advance the toolkit for bilinear multiplier problems and connect cone multiplier theory with bilinear Bochner–Riesz frameworks.

Abstract

For $f,g \in \mathscr{S}(\R^n), n\geq 3$, consider the bilinear cone multiplier operator defined by \[{T}^λ_{R}(f,g)(x):=\int_{\mathbb{R}^{2n}}m^λ\left(\frac{ξ'}{Rξ_n},\frac{η'}{Rη_n}\right)\hat{f}(ξ)\hat{g}(η)e^{2πιx\cdot(ξ+η)}~dξdη,\] where $λ>0, R>0$ and \[m^λ\left(\frac{ξ'}{Rξ_n},\frac{η'}{Rη_n}\right)=\Big(1-\frac{|ξ'|^2}{R^2ξ^2_n}-\frac{|η'|^2}{R^2η^2_n}\Big)^λ_{+}\varphi(ξ_n)\varphi(η_n),\] $(ξ',ξ_n), (η',η_n)\in\mathbb{R}^{n-1}\times \mathbb{R}$ and $\varphi\in C_{c}^{\infty}([\frac{1}{2},2])$. We investigate the problem of pointwise almost everywhere convergence of ${T}^λ_{R}(f,g)(x)$ as $R\rightarrow \infty$ for $(f,g)\in L^{p_1}\times L^{p_2}$ for a wide range of exponents $p_1, p_2$ satisfying the Hölder relation $\frac{1}{p_1}+\frac{1}{p_2}=\frac{1}{p}$. This assertion is proved by establishing suitable weighted $L^{2}\times L^{2}\rightarrow L^{1}$--estimates of the maximal bilinear cone multiplier operator \[{T}^λ_{*}(f,g)(x):=\sup_{R>0}|{T}^λ_{R}(f,g)(x)|.\]

On the bilinear cone multiplier

TL;DR

This work analyzes the pointwise convergence of the bilinear cone multiplier as for functions in , establishing convergence to the product under explicit threshold conditions on governed by the exponents . The authors reduce the problem to proving weighted estimates for the maximal operator via a detailed multiplier decomposition and a bilinear, Stein–Weiss–type representation, building on square-function and maximal-function techniques from CHLY and related works. Key contributions include a robust decomposition of the bilinear cone multiplier into and components, precise weighted bounds for associated square-functions and maximal operators, and a direct appendix confirming the essential boundedness. The results extend pointwise convergence theory to bilinear cone multipliers and illustrate how weighted bilinear estimates underpin almost everywhere convergence in higher dimensions. These methods advance the toolkit for bilinear multiplier problems and connect cone multiplier theory with bilinear Bochner–Riesz frameworks.

Abstract

For , consider the bilinear cone multiplier operator defined by where and and . We investigate the problem of pointwise almost everywhere convergence of as for for a wide range of exponents satisfying the Hölder relation . This assertion is proved by establishing suitable weighted --estimates of the maximal bilinear cone multiplier operator
Paper Structure (12 sections, 22 theorems, 149 equations)

This paper contains 12 sections, 22 theorems, 149 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1

Let $\lambda>0$ and $n\geq2$. Then for all $f\in L^{p}(\mathbb{R}^n)$ with $2\leq p<\frac{2n}{n-1-2\lambda}$, we have

Theorems & Definitions (28)

  • Theorem : CarberyRubioVega
  • Theorem : CarberyRubioVega
  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem : Theorem 1.2, CHLY
  • Remark 2.1
  • Theorem 2.2
  • Remark 2.3
  • Theorem 2.4
  • Proposition 3.1: CHLY
  • Lemma 4.1
  • ...and 18 more