BadNAVer: Exploring Jailbreak Attacks On Vision-and-Language Navigation
Wenqi Lyu, Zerui Li, Yanyuan Qiao, Qi Wu
TL;DR
The paper addresses safety risks in Vision-and-Language Navigation when using Multimodal LLMs by proposing BadNAVer, a jailbreak framework that operates at inference without model modification. It combines an object-insertion attack in MP3D with a suite of malicious textual queries across four intents, plus jailbreak prefixes, to test three attack vectors. Experiments across MP3D and on a real robot reveal high attack success rates across open- and closed-source MLLMs, underscoring potential physical safety hazards. The work offers a benchmark dataset and pipeline for evaluating VLN security and highlights the need for robust, verifiable alignment and defense mechanisms.
Abstract
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently gained attention for their generalization and reasoning capabilities in Vision-and-Language Navigation (VLN) tasks, leading to the rise of MLLM-driven navigators. However, MLLMs are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, where crafted prompts bypass safety mechanisms and trigger undesired outputs. In embodied scenarios, such vulnerabilities pose greater risks: unlike plain text models that generate toxic content, embodied agents may interpret malicious instructions as executable commands, potentially leading to real-world harm. In this paper, we present the first systematic jailbreak attack paradigm targeting MLLM-driven navigator. We propose a three-tiered attack framework and construct malicious queries across four intent categories, concatenated with standard navigation instructions. In the Matterport3D simulator, we evaluate navigation agents powered by five MLLMs and report an average attack success rate over 90%. To test real-world feasibility, we replicate the attack on a physical robot. Our results show that even well-crafted prompts can induce harmful actions and intents in MLLMs, posing risks beyond toxic output and potentially leading to physical harm.
