Table of Contents
Fetching ...

The geometric K-theory of quotient stacks

Francesco Sala, Laurent Schadeck, Angelo Vistoli

TL;DR

The paper extends Vezzosi–Vistoli's decomposition of rational equivariant K-theory to the K-theory of quotient stacks 𝓧=[X/G] with finite stabilizers over an excellent base, introducing a geometric component of K-theory and proving that the full rational K-theory admits an intrinsic decomposition compatible with stack presentations. It defines a $\mathcal{C}(G)$-decomposition over essential dual cyclic subgroups and a $μ_r$-localization framework, isolating a geometric part $K'_{*}(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbf{g}}$ that captures the quotient geometry and an algebraic part $K'_{*}(\mathcal{X})_{\mathbf{a}}$ that vanishes precisely when 𝓧 is an algebraic space. The authors establish functoriality results: $f^{*}$ preserves the geometric decomposition for representable maps of finite flat dimension, and $f_{*}$ preserves it for proper, relatively tame maps, enabling descent and ascent arguments. A tameness criterion links the vanishing of higher μ_r-parts to the underlying stack being an algebraic space, providing a computationally tractable handle on the rational K-theory of quotient stacks and enabling computation via the geometric component.

Abstract

Given a quotient of a regular noetherian separated algebraic space $X$ over a field by an affine algebraic group $G$ having finite stabilizers (with some mild technical conditions), G. Vezzosi and A. Vistoli defined the geometric part of the rational equivariant K-theory $K(X,G)$ and conjectured that it is isomorphic to the rational K-theory of the quotient $X/G$. In this paper we refine the construction of geometric K-theory to the rational K-theory of a quotient stack $[X/G]$ over an arbitrary excellent base; we show that it is part of an intrinsic decomposition of the K-theory of the stack and prove many properties that make it amenable to computations.

The geometric K-theory of quotient stacks

TL;DR

The paper extends Vezzosi–Vistoli's decomposition of rational equivariant K-theory to the K-theory of quotient stacks 𝓧=[X/G] with finite stabilizers over an excellent base, introducing a geometric component of K-theory and proving that the full rational K-theory admits an intrinsic decomposition compatible with stack presentations. It defines a -decomposition over essential dual cyclic subgroups and a -localization framework, isolating a geometric part that captures the quotient geometry and an algebraic part that vanishes precisely when 𝓧 is an algebraic space. The authors establish functoriality results: preserves the geometric decomposition for representable maps of finite flat dimension, and preserves it for proper, relatively tame maps, enabling descent and ascent arguments. A tameness criterion links the vanishing of higher μ_r-parts to the underlying stack being an algebraic space, providing a computationally tractable handle on the rational K-theory of quotient stacks and enabling computation via the geometric component.

Abstract

Given a quotient of a regular noetherian separated algebraic space over a field by an affine algebraic group having finite stabilizers (with some mild technical conditions), G. Vezzosi and A. Vistoli defined the geometric part of the rational equivariant K-theory and conjectured that it is isomorphic to the rational K-theory of the quotient . In this paper we refine the construction of geometric K-theory to the rational K-theory of a quotient stack over an arbitrary excellent base; we show that it is part of an intrinsic decomposition of the K-theory of the stack and prove many properties that make it amenable to computations.
Paper Structure (1 section, 11 theorems, 26 equations)

This paper contains 1 section, 11 theorems, 26 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1.1

Let $r$ be a fixed positive integer and $\sigma \in \mathcal{C}(G)$ be a constant dual cyclic subgroup with $\left|\sigma\right| = r$ such that $\operatorname{K}'_{*}(X, G)_{\sigma} \neq 0$.

Theorems & Definitions (21)

  • Definition
  • Definition
  • Proposition 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Corollary 1.3
  • proof : Proof of Proposition \ref{['prop:decomposition']}
  • Proposition 1.5
  • proof
  • Proposition 1.6
  • proof
  • ...and 11 more