Table of Contents
Fetching ...

On $\mathfrak{m}$-adic Continuity of $F$-Splitting Ratio

Maria Akter

TL;DR

This paper investigates the $\mathfrak{m}$-adic continuity of Frobenius splitting data for divisor pairs $(R,\Delta)$ in $F$-finite local rings of prime characteristic $p>0$. Under the assumptions that $R$ is $F$-finite, $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein, and Cohen–Macaulay, the Frobenius splitting numbers $a^{\Delta}_e(R)$ remain invariant under sufficiently small perturbations of a defining hypersurface, i.e. $a^{\Delta}_{te_0}(R/(f))=a^{\Delta}_{te_0}(R/(f+\varepsilon))$ for perturbations $\varepsilon$ in a high $\mathfrak{m}$-adic power. Moreover, a general inequality shows that the Frobenius splitting dimension does not decrease under perturbations: $\dim (R/\mathcal{P}(R/(f),\Delta|_{f})) \le \dim (R/\mathcal{P}(R/(f+\varepsilon),\Delta|_{(f+\varepsilon)}))$, with examples illustrating that equality need not hold and strict improvements can occur. The approach combines Inversion of Adjunction for $F$-purity, analysis of splitting ideals $I_e(R,\Delta)$, and local-cohomological techniques to compare splitting data between $R/(f)$ and $R/(f+\varepsilon)$, shedding light on how perturbations affect the splitting prime and associated dimensions.

Abstract

We investigate the $\mathfrak{m}$-adic continuity of Frobenius splitting dimensions and ratios for divisor pairs $(R,Δ)$ in an $F$-finite local ring $(R,\mathfrak{m},k)$ of prime characteristic $p>0$. Our main result states that if $R$ is an $F$-finite, $\mathbb{Q}$-Gorenstein, Cohen-Macaulay local ring of prime characteristic $p>0$, the Frobenius splitting numbers $a^Δ_e(R)$ remain unchanged under a suitable small perturbation. Moreover, we establish a desirable inequality of Frobenius splitting dimensions under general perturbations. That is, $\dim (R/(\mathcal{P}(R/(f),Δ|_{f})))\leq \dim (R/(\mathcal{P}(R/(f+\varepsilon),Δ|_{(f+\varepsilon)})))$ for all $\varepsilon \in \mathfrak{m}^{N\gg0}$, providing an example that demonstrates strict improvement can occur.

On $\mathfrak{m}$-adic Continuity of $F$-Splitting Ratio

TL;DR

This paper investigates the -adic continuity of Frobenius splitting data for divisor pairs in -finite local rings of prime characteristic . Under the assumptions that is -finite, -Gorenstein, and Cohen–Macaulay, the Frobenius splitting numbers remain invariant under sufficiently small perturbations of a defining hypersurface, i.e. for perturbations in a high -adic power. Moreover, a general inequality shows that the Frobenius splitting dimension does not decrease under perturbations: , with examples illustrating that equality need not hold and strict improvements can occur. The approach combines Inversion of Adjunction for -purity, analysis of splitting ideals , and local-cohomological techniques to compare splitting data between and , shedding light on how perturbations affect the splitting prime and associated dimensions.

Abstract

We investigate the -adic continuity of Frobenius splitting dimensions and ratios for divisor pairs in an -finite local ring of prime characteristic . Our main result states that if is an -finite, -Gorenstein, Cohen-Macaulay local ring of prime characteristic , the Frobenius splitting numbers remain unchanged under a suitable small perturbation. Moreover, we establish a desirable inequality of Frobenius splitting dimensions under general perturbations. That is, for all , providing an example that demonstrates strict improvement can occur.
Paper Structure (5 sections, 13 theorems, 111 equations)

This paper contains 5 sections, 13 theorems, 111 equations.

Key Result

Theorem A

Let $(R,\mathfrak{m}, k)$ be a local $F$-finite, $F$-pure, $\mathop{\mathrm{\mathbb{Q}}}\nolimits$-Gorenstein, Cohen-Macaulay ring of prime characteristic $p>0$ and $f\in R$ be a nonzero divisor of $R$. Let $\mathop{\mathrm{\mathcal{P}}}\nolimits(R/(f))$ be the lift of the splitting prime of $R/(f)$ In particular, if $\mathop{\mathrm{\mathcal{P}}}\nolimits(R/(f))=\mathfrak{m}/(f)$, then there exis

Theorems & Definitions (32)

  • Theorem A
  • Theorem B
  • Theorem C
  • Theorem 2.1
  • Proposition 2.2
  • Corollary 2.3
  • Definition 2.4
  • Remark 2.5
  • Definition 2.6
  • Definition 2.7
  • ...and 22 more