Multimodal Cancer Survival Analysis via Hypergraph Learning with Cross-Modality Rebalance
Mingcheng Qu, Guang Yang, Donglin Di, Tonghua Su, Yue Gao, Yang Song, Lei Fan
TL;DR
This work addresses the core challenge of multimodal cancer survival prediction by combining high-resolution pathology (WSIs) with genomics. It introduces MRePath, a framework that uses a sheaf-enabled hypergraph to capture contextual and hierarchical information in WSIs and a dynamic modality rebalance with cross-modal fusion to mitigate pathology-genomics imbalance. Across five TCGA cohorts, MRePath achieves a mean C-Index of approximately 71.5%, outperforming state-of-the-art methods by about 3.4 percentage points, and its ablations demonstrate the effectiveness of jointly modeling high-order patch relationships and adaptive, interactive fusion. The approach advances prognostic accuracy and interpretability by illustrating modality interactions and identifying gene signatures associated with risk, with potential clinical impact for more reliable survival predictions.
Abstract
Multimodal pathology-genomic analysis has become increasingly prominent in cancer survival prediction. However, existing studies mainly utilize multi-instance learning to aggregate patch-level features, neglecting the information loss of contextual and hierarchical details within pathology images. Furthermore, the disparity in data granularity and dimensionality between pathology and genomics leads to a significant modality imbalance. The high spatial resolution inherent in pathology data renders it a dominant role while overshadowing genomics in multimodal integration. In this paper, we propose a multimodal survival prediction framework that incorporates hypergraph learning to effectively capture both contextual and hierarchical details from pathology images. Moreover, it employs a modality rebalance mechanism and an interactive alignment fusion strategy to dynamically reweight the contributions of the two modalities, thereby mitigating the pathology-genomics imbalance. Quantitative and qualitative experiments are conducted on five TCGA datasets, demonstrating that our model outperforms advanced methods by over 3.4\% in C-Index performance.
