Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Topologies and sheaves on causal manifolds

Pierre Schapira

TL;DR

The paper extends KS90's equivalence between micro-supported and topological-derived categories from linear spaces to causal manifolds by developing $γ$- and $λ$-topologies on $M$ and introducing a future time function. It proves that these topologies coincide and, under a future time function, establishes an equivalence $\mathrm{D}^{\mathrm{b}}_{{γ}^{\circ a}}({\bf k}_M) \simeq \mathrm{D}^{\mathrm{b}}({\bf k}_{M_γ})$ with quasi-inverse $\varphi_γ^{-1}$, generalizing the KS framework to causal manifolds. The work builds on preorders $\preceq_{γ}$ and $\preceq_{λ}$ to analyze causal propagation and shows how the interplay between microlocal data and topology yields global equivalences, even beyond vector spaces. This provides a robust microlocal-sheaf-theoretic bridge for causal geometry and has potential implications for hyperbolic D-modules and spacetime analysis.

Abstract

A causal manifold $(M,γ)$ is a manifold $M$ endowed with a closed proper cone $γ$ in the tangent bundle $TM$ such that the projection $TM\to M$ is surjective when restricted to the interior of $γ$. Let $λ$ be the antipodal of the polar cone of $γ$. An open set $U$ of $M$ is called $γ$-open if its Whitney normal cone contains the interior of $γ$. Similarly, $U$ is called $λ$-open if the micro-support of the constant sheaf on $U$ is contained in $λ$. We begin by proving that the two notions coincide. Next, we prove that if $(M,γ)$ admits a ``future time function'' the functor of direct images establishes an equivalence of triangulated categories between the derived category of sheaves on $M$ micro-supported by $λ$ and the derived category of sheaves on the manifold $M$ endowed with the $γ$-topology. This generalizes a result of~\cite{KS90} which dealt with the case of a constant cone in a vector space.

Topologies and sheaves on causal manifolds

TL;DR

The paper extends KS90's equivalence between micro-supported and topological-derived categories from linear spaces to causal manifolds by developing - and -topologies on and introducing a future time function. It proves that these topologies coincide and, under a future time function, establishes an equivalence with quasi-inverse , generalizing the KS framework to causal manifolds. The work builds on preorders and to analyze causal propagation and shows how the interplay between microlocal data and topology yields global equivalences, even beyond vector spaces. This provides a robust microlocal-sheaf-theoretic bridge for causal geometry and has potential implications for hyperbolic D-modules and spacetime analysis.

Abstract

A causal manifold is a manifold endowed with a closed proper cone in the tangent bundle such that the projection is surjective when restricted to the interior of . Let be the antipodal of the polar cone of . An open set of is called -open if its Whitney normal cone contains the interior of . Similarly, is called -open if the micro-support of the constant sheaf on is contained in . We begin by proving that the two notions coincide. Next, we prove that if admits a ``future time function'' the functor of direct images establishes an equivalence of triangulated categories between the derived category of sheaves on micro-supported by and the derived category of sheaves on the manifold endowed with the -topology. This generalizes a result of~\cite{KS90} which dealt with the case of a constant cone in a vector space.
Paper Structure (5 sections, 29 theorems, 31 equations)

This paper contains 5 sections, 29 theorems, 31 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 2.2

Let $\mathbb{V}$ and $\gamma$ be as above. Let $U$ be open in $\mathbb{V}$ and let $x_0\in\partial U$. Assume that for an open neighborhood $U_0$ of $x_0$, $U_0\times_\mathbb{V}\operatorname{SS}({\bf k}_U)\subset U_0\times \theta^{\circ a}$. Then there exists an open subset $W$ of $\mathbb{V}$ which

Theorems & Definitions (74)

  • Definition 2.1
  • Lemma 2.2
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.3
  • proof
  • Lemma 2.4
  • proof
  • Definition 2.5
  • Lemma 2.6
  • proof
  • ...and 64 more