Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Unitary dual of $p$-adic split $\mathrm{SO}_{2n+1}$ and $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}$: The good parity case (and slightly beyond)

Hiraku Atobe, Alberto Minguez

Abstract

Let $F$ be a $p$-adic field, and let $G$ be either the split special orthogonal group $\mathrm{SO}_{2n+1}(F)$ or the symplectic group $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}(F)$, with $n \geq 0$. We prove that a smooth irreducible representation of good parity of $G$ is unitary if and only if it is of Arthur type. Combined with the algorithms of the first author or Hazeltine-Liu-Lo for detecting Arthur type representations, our result leads to an explicit algorithm for checking the unitarity of any given irreducible representation of good parity. Finally, we determine the set of unitary representations that may appear as local components of the discrete automorphic spectrum.

Unitary dual of $p$-adic split $\mathrm{SO}_{2n+1}$ and $\mathrm{Sp}_{2n}$: The good parity case (and slightly beyond)

Abstract

Let be a -adic field, and let be either the split special orthogonal group or the symplectic group , with . We prove that a smooth irreducible representation of good parity of is unitary if and only if it is of Arthur type. Combined with the algorithms of the first author or Hazeltine-Liu-Lo for detecting Arthur type representations, our result leads to an explicit algorithm for checking the unitarity of any given irreducible representation of good parity. Finally, we determine the set of unitary representations that may appear as local components of the discrete automorphic spectrum.
Paper Structure (23 sections, 20 theorems, 187 equations)

This paper contains 23 sections, 20 theorems, 187 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $\pi$ be an irreducible representation of $G(F)$ of good parity. Then $\pi$ is unitary if and only if it is of Arthur type.

Theorems & Definitions (30)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2: Theorem \ref{['inductive']}
  • Theorem 2.1: Geometric Lemma (BZ)
  • Corollary 2.2: Tadić's formula T-str
  • Proposition 2.3
  • Theorem 3.1
  • Corollary 3.2
  • Theorem 3.3
  • Lemma 3.4
  • proof
  • ...and 20 more