Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Taut fillings of the 2-sphere

Peter Doyle, Matthew Ellison, Zili Wang

TL;DR

The paper studies minimal $L_1$-norm fillings of 2-sphere cycles arising from triangulations $\sigma$ of $S^2$ and proves that taut fillings correspond exactly to extensions of $\sigma$ to shellable triangulations of the 3-ball, i.e., to triangulations of $B^3$. A central technical advance is that $\mathrm{Zvol}$, the minimal filling size, is additive under almost disjoint unions for $n\ge 2$, and that taut fillings split under such unions; these properties propagate to the 2-sphere setting via a detailed combinatorial and topological framework. The authors connect $\mathrm{Zvol}(\sigma)$ to the minimal number of tetrahedra needed to extend $\sigma$ to a triangulation of $B^3$, showing $\mathrm{Zvol}(\sigma)=\mathrm{tetvol}(\sigma)$, and demonstrate that taut fillings of $X(\sigma)$ yield freely monotone shellable ball triangulations. While the results sit firmly in dimension 2, they illuminate the structure of fillings and their decomposition, though they do not extend to 3- or higher-dimensional spheres. The work integrates coning, almost disjoint unions, and shelling as key tools to bridge combinatorial optimization with constructive topology on triangulated spheres.

Abstract

Let $σ$ be a simplicial triangulation of the 2-sphere, $X$ the associated integral 2-cycle. A filling of $X$ is an integral 3-chain $Y$ with $\partial Y = X$; a taut filling is one with minimal $L_1$-norm. We show that any taut filling arises from an extension of $σ$ to a shellable simplicial triangulation of the 3-ball. The key to the proof is the general fact that any taut filling of an $n$-cycle splits under disjoint union, connected sum, and more generally what we call almost disjoint union, where summands are supported on sets that overlap in at most $n+1$ vertices. Despite the generality of this result, we have nothing to say about optimal fillings of spheres of dimension 3 or higher.

Taut fillings of the 2-sphere

TL;DR

The paper studies minimal -norm fillings of 2-sphere cycles arising from triangulations of and proves that taut fillings correspond exactly to extensions of to shellable triangulations of the 3-ball, i.e., to triangulations of . A central technical advance is that , the minimal filling size, is additive under almost disjoint unions for , and that taut fillings split under such unions; these properties propagate to the 2-sphere setting via a detailed combinatorial and topological framework. The authors connect to the minimal number of tetrahedra needed to extend to a triangulation of , showing , and demonstrate that taut fillings of yield freely monotone shellable ball triangulations. While the results sit firmly in dimension 2, they illuminate the structure of fillings and their decomposition, though they do not extend to 3- or higher-dimensional spheres. The work integrates coning, almost disjoint unions, and shelling as key tools to bridge combinatorial optimization with constructive topology on triangulated spheres.

Abstract

Let be a simplicial triangulation of the 2-sphere, the associated integral 2-cycle. A filling of is an integral 3-chain with ; a taut filling is one with minimal -norm. We show that any taut filling arises from an extension of to a shellable simplicial triangulation of the 3-ball. The key to the proof is the general fact that any taut filling of an -cycle splits under disjoint union, connected sum, and more generally what we call almost disjoint union, where summands are supported on sets that overlap in at most vertices. Despite the generality of this result, we have nothing to say about optimal fillings of spheres of dimension 3 or higher.
Paper Structure (8 sections, 9 theorems, 28 equations)

This paper contains 8 sections, 9 theorems, 28 equations.

Key Result

Proposition 1

If $Y$ is taut and $U \subset Y$ then $U$ is taut.

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Proposition 1
  • Proposition 2
  • Proposition 3
  • Proposition 4
  • Proposition 5
  • Theorem 1
  • Corollary 1
  • Theorem 2
  • Theorem 3