Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Classification of obscuration-free reflective polygonal light beams

Pierre Franck, Audric Drogoul

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of classifying obscuration-free planar optical configurations modeled by reflective polygonal surfaces by studying the connected components of the configuration space $E$. It builds a sequence of polygonal models—$LO^N(\mathbb{R}^2)$, $LR^N(\mathbb{R}^2)$, and $Faisc^N(\mathbb{R}^2)$—and introduces exact topological invariants $N$, $N^{R}$, Car, Car$^{F}$, yielding exact invariants $I^{F}=(N^{F},Car^{F})$ (and variants $I^{S}$) that classify components; symmetry is handled via a $\mathbb{Z}/2\mathbb{Z}$ quotient. The framework is applied to three-mirror telescopes to define paired on-off axis nomenclature, with numerical evidence suggesting at least 160 connected components in the paired model, aligning with prior onaxis24 results. Overall, the invariants provide a practical labeling scheme that reduces brute-force exploration to topology-guided classification, aiding optical design and exhaustive sampling of admissible configurations.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the connected components of an obscuration-free planar polygonal light beam space modeling light propagation in optical systems composed of reflective surfaces and a focal plane. Through homotopy construction, we demonstrate that the connected components of this space are in bijection with the connected components of the reflective polygonal chains space, whose elements are the polygonal chains with their respective mirrors' orientations taken into account. In order to prove this, we introduce a topological invariant that provides an intelligible way for opticians to name homotopy-equivalent obscuration-free optical configurations thanks to previous work with polygonal chains.

Classification of obscuration-free reflective polygonal light beams

TL;DR

The paper addresses the problem of classifying obscuration-free planar optical configurations modeled by reflective polygonal surfaces by studying the connected components of the configuration space . It builds a sequence of polygonal models—, , and —and introduces exact topological invariants , , Car, Car, yielding exact invariants (and variants ) that classify components; symmetry is handled via a quotient. The framework is applied to three-mirror telescopes to define paired on-off axis nomenclature, with numerical evidence suggesting at least 160 connected components in the paired model, aligning with prior onaxis24 results. Overall, the invariants provide a practical labeling scheme that reduces brute-force exploration to topology-guided classification, aiding optical design and exhaustive sampling of admissible configurations.

Abstract

In this paper, we study the connected components of an obscuration-free planar polygonal light beam space modeling light propagation in optical systems composed of reflective surfaces and a focal plane. Through homotopy construction, we demonstrate that the connected components of this space are in bijection with the connected components of the reflective polygonal chains space, whose elements are the polygonal chains with their respective mirrors' orientations taken into account. In order to prove this, we introduce a topological invariant that provides an intelligible way for opticians to name homotopy-equivalent obscuration-free optical configurations thanks to previous work with polygonal chains.
Paper Structure (7 sections, 19 theorems, 60 equations, 9 figures)

This paper contains 7 sections, 19 theorems, 60 equations, 9 figures.

Key Result

Theorem 1

The space of beams for $N = 3$ and $4$ mirrors has an exact topological invariant $\text{\normalfont{I}}^{\text{\normalfont{F}}}$.

Figures (9)

  • Figure 1: An obscuration-free (a) and and obscured (b) light beam composed of three mirrors and a focal plane.
  • Figure 2: Non admissible polygonal chains: (a) the mirror $c_4$ is obscuring the ray $R_1=[c_1,c_2]$, (b) the mirror $c_4$ is obscuring the light source $R_0=(c_0,c_1]$ and (c) the mirror $c_2$ is grazing since it belongs to $[c_1,c_3]$.
  • Figure 3: Admissible angles for reflexive polygonal chains.
  • Figure 4: Caracteristic for two polygonal chains $L$ and $L'$
  • Figure 5: Illustration of $(B_L^+)_1$ and $(B_L^-)_1$
  • ...and 4 more figures

Theorems & Definitions (65)

  • Definition 1.1: Topological invariant
  • Theorem : \ref{['theoreme_nomenclature']} and \ref{['thm invariance']}
  • Definition 2.1: Ray for a polygonal chain
  • Definition 2.2: Space $\text{\normalfont{LO}}^N(\mathbb{R}^2)$
  • Definition 2.3: Exact Invariant: Off-Axis Nomenclature
  • Theorem 2.4: offaxis24
  • Definition 3.1: Reflexive polygonal chain
  • Definition 3.2: Application $M_O$
  • Definition 3.3: Ray of a Reflexive Polygonal Chain
  • Definition 3.4: Nomenclature $\text{\normalfont{N}}^{\text{\normalfont{R}}}$
  • ...and 55 more