Topology and geometry optimization of grid-shells under self-weight loading
Helen E. Fairclough, Karol Bolbotowski, Linwei He, Andrew Liew, Matthew Gilbert
TL;DR
This paper extends convex grid-shell topology and geometry optimization to include the structure's self-weight by embedding a catenary-equal-stress model within a second-order cone programming framework. By introducing variables for horizontal forces and end-vertical forces, and relaxing geometric coupling to a rotated conic constraint, the authors obtain a globally optimal solution for a fixed ground structure while enabling reliable reconstruction of elevations from primal/dual solutions. The approach is validated on diverse examples (barrel vault, square domains with distributed and point loads, holes, and self-intersections), demonstrating that self-weight significantly alters both topology and elevations and that the method achieves substantial speedups over conventional 3D truss formulations. The work provides a practical tool for designing efficient grid-shells under self-weight, with clear guidelines for reconstruction and interpretations when fully stressed conditions fail, and it includes accessible scripts and Grasshopper files for replication.
Abstract
This manuscript presents an approach for simultaneously optimizing the connectivity and elevation of grid-shell structures acting in pure compression (or pure tension) under the combined effects of a prescribed external loading and the design-dependent self-weight of the structure itself. The method derived herein involves solving a second-order cone optimization problem, thereby ensuring convexity and obtaining globally optimal results for a given discretization of the design domain. Several numerical examples are presented, illustrating characteristics of this class of optimal structures. It is found that, as self-weight becomes more significant, both the optimal topology and the optimal elevation profile of the structure change, highlighting the importance of optimizing both topology and geometry simultaneously from the earliest stages of design. It is shown that this approach can obtain solutions with greater accuracy and several orders of magnitude more quickly than a standard 3D layout/truss topology optimization approach.
