Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Super-fast rates of convergence for Neural Networks Classifiers under the Hard Margin Condition

Nathanael Tepakbong, Ding-Xuan Zhou, Xiang Zhou

TL;DR

The paper addresses binary classification with deep ReLU networks under Tsybakov's margin framework, including the hard-margin limit, and proves non-asymptotic excess-risk bounds. By introducing a novel excess-risk decomposition and leveraging approximation theory for smooth regression functions, it shows that ARMs with square-loss surrogates and $\ell_p$ penalties can achieve arbitrarily fast rates $\mathcal{O}(n^{-\alpha})$ with suitable network architectures, and exponential rates in a teacher-student setup. Under the hard-margin condition, the exponent can scale with the smoothness $s$, yielding super-fast convergence, while the well-specified teacher-student case achieves exponential decay regardless of network depth. The results provide a rigorous theory explaining how deep networks can attain CoD-free, even super-fast, learning rates in separable-margin regimes, with explicit, non-asymptotic bounds and constructive architecture guidance.

Abstract

We study the classical binary classification problem for hypothesis spaces of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) with ReLU activation under Tsybakov's low-noise condition with exponent $q>0$, and its limit-case $q\to\infty$ which we refer to as the "hard-margin condition". We show that DNNs which minimize the empirical risk with square loss surrogate and $\ell_p$ penalty can achieve finite-sample excess risk bounds of order $\mathcal{O}\left(n^{-α}\right)$ for arbitrarily large $α>0$ under the hard-margin condition, provided that the regression function $η$ is sufficiently smooth. The proof relies on a novel decomposition of the excess risk which might be of independent interest.

Super-fast rates of convergence for Neural Networks Classifiers under the Hard Margin Condition

TL;DR

The paper addresses binary classification with deep ReLU networks under Tsybakov's margin framework, including the hard-margin limit, and proves non-asymptotic excess-risk bounds. By introducing a novel excess-risk decomposition and leveraging approximation theory for smooth regression functions, it shows that ARMs with square-loss surrogates and penalties can achieve arbitrarily fast rates with suitable network architectures, and exponential rates in a teacher-student setup. Under the hard-margin condition, the exponent can scale with the smoothness , yielding super-fast convergence, while the well-specified teacher-student case achieves exponential decay regardless of network depth. The results provide a rigorous theory explaining how deep networks can attain CoD-free, even super-fast, learning rates in separable-margin regimes, with explicit, non-asymptotic bounds and constructive architecture guidance.

Abstract

We study the classical binary classification problem for hypothesis spaces of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) with ReLU activation under Tsybakov's low-noise condition with exponent , and its limit-case which we refer to as the "hard-margin condition". We show that DNNs which minimize the empirical risk with square loss surrogate and penalty can achieve finite-sample excess risk bounds of order for arbitrarily large under the hard-margin condition, provided that the regression function is sufficiently smooth. The proof relies on a novel decomposition of the excess risk which might be of independent interest.
Paper Structure (21 sections, 14 theorems, 95 equations)

This paper contains 21 sections, 14 theorems, 95 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1

Let $f^*\in L^{\infty}(\mathcal{X},\mathbb{R})$ and $D\ge\|f^*\|_{L^{\infty}(\mathcal{X},\mathbb{R})}$. For any $f\in L^{\infty}(\mathcal{X},\mathbb{R})$, we have where $\operatorname{clip}_D$ is as defined in clip.

Theorems & Definitions (26)

  • Lemma 1
  • proof
  • Lemma 2
  • proof : Proof of Lemma \ref{['lemma:finite_sup']}
  • Definition 1: $\varepsilon$-cover
  • Definition 2: $\varepsilon$-covering number
  • Definition 3
  • Theorem 1
  • Lemma 3: Theorem 2.6 in berner2020analysis
  • Lemma 4
  • ...and 16 more