Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Rationality patterns

Takuma Hayashi

TL;DR

The work develops a categorical framework for rationality problems in representation theory by extending Loewy’s real-form classification and Borel–Tits’ descent criterion to Γ-categories via descent data. It introduces Loewy data, Loewy pairs, and Loewy–Borel–Tits data to systematically study when self-conjugate simple objects admit $F$-forms and to identify minimal fields of definition, connecting these obstructions to endomorphism algebras and Brauer classes. The framework is then applied to $(\mathfrak{g},K)$-modules, proving that base-change preserves finite length, establishing local-global principles for BT cocycles, and giving methods to compute cocycles via $K$-types and to determine minimal fields for cohomological irreducible essentially unitarizable Harish-Chandra modules. These results unify descent theory, Galois cohomology, and representation theory, with potential geometric applications to equivariant twisted $D$-modules and broader rationality questions in algebraic representation theory.

Abstract

In this paper, we establish general categorical frameworks that extend Loewy's classification scheme for finite-dimensional real irreducible representations of groups and Borel--Tits' criterion for the existence of rational forms of representations of $\bar{F}\otimes_F G$ for a connected reductive algebraic group $G$ over a field $F$ of characteristic zero and its algebraic closure $\bar{F}$. We also discuss applications of these general formalisms to the theory of Harish-Chandra modules, specifically to classify irreducible Harish-Chandra modules over fields $F$ of characteristic zero and to identify smaller fields of definition of irreducible Harish-Chandra modules over $\bar{F}$, particularly in the case of cohomological irreducible essentially unitarizable modules.

Rationality patterns

TL;DR

The work develops a categorical framework for rationality problems in representation theory by extending Loewy’s real-form classification and Borel–Tits’ descent criterion to Γ-categories via descent data. It introduces Loewy data, Loewy pairs, and Loewy–Borel–Tits data to systematically study when self-conjugate simple objects admit -forms and to identify minimal fields of definition, connecting these obstructions to endomorphism algebras and Brauer classes. The framework is then applied to -modules, proving that base-change preserves finite length, establishing local-global principles for BT cocycles, and giving methods to compute cocycles via -types and to determine minimal fields for cohomological irreducible essentially unitarizable Harish-Chandra modules. These results unify descent theory, Galois cohomology, and representation theory, with potential geometric applications to equivariant twisted -modules and broader rationality questions in algebraic representation theory.

Abstract

In this paper, we establish general categorical frameworks that extend Loewy's classification scheme for finite-dimensional real irreducible representations of groups and Borel--Tits' criterion for the existence of rational forms of representations of for a connected reductive algebraic group over a field of characteristic zero and its algebraic closure . We also discuss applications of these general formalisms to the theory of Harish-Chandra modules, specifically to classify irreducible Harish-Chandra modules over fields of characteristic zero and to identify smaller fields of definition of irreducible Harish-Chandra modules over , particularly in the case of cohomological irreducible essentially unitarizable modules.
Paper Structure (31 sections, 69 theorems, 59 equations)

This paper contains 31 sections, 69 theorems, 59 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.2.1

Let $G$ be a group.

Theorems & Definitions (162)

  • Theorem 1.2.1: MR1500635
  • Theorem 1.2.2: MR1500635
  • Theorem 1.4.1: Theorem \ref{['thm:Loewy']}
  • Theorem 1.4.2: Definition-Proposition \ref{['defprop:BT']}
  • Example 1.4.3: Example \ref{['ex:affinegroupscheme']}, Proposition \ref{['prop:key_computation_BT']}
  • Theorem 1.4.4: Theorem \ref{['thm:abs_simple']}
  • Theorem 1.4.5: Corollary \ref{['cor:LBT']}
  • Proposition 1.5.1: MR3770183
  • Theorem 1.6.1: Theorem \ref{['thm:hc_setting']}, Proposition \ref{['prop:fl->Zf']}
  • Corollary 1.6.2: Definition \ref{['defn:fld_rat']}, Proposition \ref{['prop:min_field']}, Remark \ref{['rem:existence']}
  • ...and 152 more