Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Compatibility of Higher Specht Polynomials and Decompositions of Representations

Shaul Zemel

TL;DR

This work develops a stable, combinatorial framework for higher Specht polynomials and their representations. It first normalizes higher Specht polynomials and constructs stable, infinite-variable limits compatible with embedding $S_n \hookrightarrow S_{n+1}$, using evacuation and ct-destandardization tied to RSK. It then decomposes the $S_n$-action on higher Specht polynomials into irreducible components indexed by standard and cocharge tableaux, with multiplicities governed by Kostka numbers, and identifies a natural lift to orbit representations on ordered partitions. Finally, it builds explicit maps between representations via star/bar insertions and Ind/Ext operations, lifting the Branching Rule to polynomial representations and establishing stability results as $n$ grows. The results unify normalization, decomposition, and interlevel maps, enabling a systematic passage to stable, infinite-variable limits and offering a robust framework for representation stability in this combinatorial setting.

Abstract

%We show how to normalize the higher Specht polynomials of Ariki, Terasoma, and Yamada in a compatible way in order to define a stable version of these polynomials. We also decompose the non-transitive actions of Haglund, Rhoades, and Shimozono into orbits, and show how the associated basis of higher Specht polynomials of Gillespie and Rhoades respects that decomposition. For a given $n$, the orbits of the action of $S_{n}$ are associated with subsets of the set of positive integers that are smaller than $n$, and we relate the representation associated with a set $I$ to the ones of $S_{n+1}$ associated with $I$ and with its union with $n$, the latter being a lifting of the Branching Rule.

Compatibility of Higher Specht Polynomials and Decompositions of Representations

TL;DR

This work develops a stable, combinatorial framework for higher Specht polynomials and their representations. It first normalizes higher Specht polynomials and constructs stable, infinite-variable limits compatible with embedding , using evacuation and ct-destandardization tied to RSK. It then decomposes the -action on higher Specht polynomials into irreducible components indexed by standard and cocharge tableaux, with multiplicities governed by Kostka numbers, and identifies a natural lift to orbit representations on ordered partitions. Finally, it builds explicit maps between representations via star/bar insertions and Ind/Ext operations, lifting the Branching Rule to polynomial representations and establishing stability results as grows. The results unify normalization, decomposition, and interlevel maps, enabling a systematic passage to stable, infinite-variable limits and offering a robust framework for representation stability in this combinatorial setting.

Abstract

%We show how to normalize the higher Specht polynomials of Ariki, Terasoma, and Yamada in a compatible way in order to define a stable version of these polynomials. We also decompose the non-transitive actions of Haglund, Rhoades, and Shimozono into orbits, and show how the associated basis of higher Specht polynomials of Gillespie and Rhoades respects that decomposition. For a given , the orbits of the action of are associated with subsets of the set of positive integers that are smaller than , and we relate the representation associated with a set to the ones of associated with and with its union with , the latter being a lifting of the Branching Rule.
Paper Structure (4 sections, 31 theorems, 35 equations)

This paper contains 4 sections, 31 theorems, 35 equations.

Key Result

Lemma 1.4

For any $w \in S_{n}$ we have the equalities $\operatorname{Asl}(w)=\operatorname{Asi}(Q(w))$ and $\operatorname{Dsl}(w)=\operatorname{Dsi}(Q(w))$.

Theorems & Definitions (117)

  • Definition 1.1
  • Definition 1.2
  • Remark 1.3
  • Lemma 1.4
  • proof
  • Lemma 1.5
  • Example 1.6
  • Definition 1.7
  • Lemma 1.8
  • proof
  • ...and 107 more