RiM: Record, Improve and Maintain Physical Well-being using Federated Learning
Aditya Mishra, Haroon Lone
TL;DR
RiM addresses privacy-sensitive wellness support for students by combining federated learning with a lightweight mobile recommendation engine. The approach pre-trains an MLP on a large synthetic dataset and privately fine-tunes on real on-device data via Flower, using both FedAvg and FedPer to balance global learning and personalization. A hybrid recommender integrates ML-predicted deficits with rule-based risk scoring to surface the top personalized lifestyle recommendations. Experimental results on 10 clients show FedAvg achieving higher accuracy (60.71%) and lower MAE (0.91) than FedPer (46.34%, 1.19), illustrating the privacy-preserving potential for real-world wellness interventions; Android API support was limited to version 13, with planned enhancements including on-device inference and Ditto-based bi-level FL.
Abstract
In academic settings, the demanding environment often forces students to prioritize academic performance over their physical well-being. Moreover, privacy concerns and the inherent risk of data breaches hinder the deployment of traditional machine learning techniques for addressing these health challenges. In this study, we introduce RiM: Record, Improve, and Maintain, a mobile application which incorporates a novel personalized machine learning framework that leverages federated learning to enhance students' physical well-being by analyzing their lifestyle habits. Our approach involves pre-training a multilayer perceptron (MLP) model on a large-scale simulated dataset to generate personalized recommendations. Subsequently, we employ federated learning to fine-tune the model using data from IISER Bhopal students, thereby ensuring its applicability in real-world scenarios. The federated learning approach guarantees differential privacy by exclusively sharing model weights rather than raw data. Experimental results show that the FedAvg-based RiM model achieves an average accuracy of 60.71% and a mean absolute error of 0.91--outperforming the FedPer variant (average accuracy 46.34%, MAE 1.19)--thereby demonstrating its efficacy in predicting lifestyle deficits under privacy-preserving constraints.
