Table of Contents
Fetching ...

Congruences for sums of Delannoy numbers and polynomials

Rong-Hua Wang, Michael X. X. Zhong

TL;DR

The paper addresses arithmetic properties of sums of Delannoy numbers and Delannoy polynomials by applying the power-partible reduction. The authors establish a general reduction framework that yields prime-modular congruences with Legendre symbols and, for powers of two, new supercongruences with constants $\rho_v$ and $\tilde{\rho}_v$ that are independent of $n$ and computable. They provide explicit recurrence relations and initial values for the constants, including an explicit confirmation of Guo and Zeng's 2012 conjecture in the case $v=1$. The work enhances understanding of Delannoy arithmetic and connects to Apéry-type congruences through a mechanizable method to derive and verify modular relations.

Abstract

In this paper, we apply the power-partible reduction to study arithmetic properties of sums involving Delannoy numbers $D_k$ and polynomials $D_k(z)$. Let $v\in\bN$ and $p$ be an odd prime. It is proved that, for any $z\in\bZ\setminus\{0,-1\}$, there exist $c_v\in z^{-v}\bZ[z]$ and $\tilde{c}_v\in (z+1)^{-v}\bZ[z]$, both free of $p$ and can be determined mechanically, such that \begin{equation*} \sum_{k=0}^{p-1}(2k+1)^{2v}D_k(z)\equiv c_v \left(\frac{-z}{p}\right) \pmod {p} \end{equation*} if $\gcd(p,z)=1$ and \begin{equation*} \sum_{k=0}^{p-1}(-1)^k(2k+1)^{2v}D_k(z)\equiv \tilde{c}_v \left(\frac{z+1}{p}\right) \pmod {p} \end{equation*} if $\gcd(p,z+1)=1$. Here $(-)$ denotes the Legendre symbol. When $n$ is a power of $2$, we find there exist odd integers $ρ_v$ and even integers $\tildeρ_v$, both independent of $n$ and can be determined mechanically, such that \[ \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(2k+1)^{2v+1}D_k\equiv ρ_v n \pmod {n^3} \] and \[ \sum_{k=0}^{n-1}(-1)^k(2k+1)^{2v+1}D_k\equiv \tildeρ_v n^2 \pmod {n^3}. \] The case $v=1$ in the last congruence confirms a conjecture of Guo and Zeng in 2012.

Congruences for sums of Delannoy numbers and polynomials

TL;DR

The paper addresses arithmetic properties of sums of Delannoy numbers and Delannoy polynomials by applying the power-partible reduction. The authors establish a general reduction framework that yields prime-modular congruences with Legendre symbols and, for powers of two, new supercongruences with constants and that are independent of and computable. They provide explicit recurrence relations and initial values for the constants, including an explicit confirmation of Guo and Zeng's 2012 conjecture in the case . The work enhances understanding of Delannoy arithmetic and connects to Apéry-type congruences through a mechanizable method to derive and verify modular relations.

Abstract

In this paper, we apply the power-partible reduction to study arithmetic properties of sums involving Delannoy numbers and polynomials . Let and be an odd prime. It is proved that, for any , there exist and , both free of and can be determined mechanically, such that \begin{equation*} \sum_{k=0}^{p-1}(2k+1)^{2v}D_k(z)\equiv c_v \left(\frac{-z}{p}\right) \pmod {p} \end{equation*} if and \begin{equation*} \sum_{k=0}^{p-1}(-1)^k(2k+1)^{2v}D_k(z)\equiv \tilde{c}_v \left(\frac{z+1}{p}\right) \pmod {p} \end{equation*} if . Here denotes the Legendre symbol. When is a power of , we find there exist odd integers and even integers , both independent of and can be determined mechanically, such that and The case in the last congruence confirms a conjecture of Guo and Zeng in 2012.
Paper Structure (5 sections, 8 theorems, 93 equations)

This paper contains 5 sections, 8 theorems, 93 equations.

Key Result

Theorem 1.1

Let $n\in {\mathbb{Z}}^+$. For each $v\in {\mathbb{N}}$ and $z\in {\mathbb{Z}}\setminus\{0,-1\}$, we have when $\gcd(n,2z)=1$ and when $\gcd(n,2(z+1))=1$. Here $c_0=\tilde{c}_0=1$ and when $v\geq 1$, where for $s\in {\mathbb{N}}$ and $j=1,2,\ldots,\left\lfloor \dfrac{s+1}{2}\right\rfloor$.

Theorems & Definitions (9)

  • Theorem 1.1
  • Theorem 1.2
  • Theorem 1.3
  • Theorem 2.1: Theorem 2.4 in WZ2024
  • Theorem 2.2
  • proof
  • Corollary 2.3
  • Lemma 2.4
  • Theorem 3.1