SlideItRight: Using AI to Find Relevant Slides and Provide Feedback for Open-Ended Questions
Chloe Qianhui Zhao, Jie Cao, Eason Chen, Kenneth R. Koedinger, Jionghao Lin
TL;DR
SlideItRight tackles the challenge of scalable, personalized feedback by combining LLM-generated textual feedback with retrieved, slide-grounded references. The system employs retrieval-augmented generation and a 2×2 crowdsourced study to compare human, AI, slide, and combined feedback modalities, measuring pre/post learning gains and post-survey perceptions. Results show significant learning gains across all conditions but no statistically significant differences between modalities; AI offers strong personalization and rapid feedback, while slide content supports clarity and trust, with the combined approach offering the strongest mean gains yet potential cognitive load concerns. The work demonstrates that AI-powered, multimodal feedback can match human effectiveness and offers practical implications for integrating such systems into learning platforms, while highlighting needs for better explainability, reliability, and load management to maximize adoption and impact.
Abstract
Feedback is important in supporting student learning. While various automated feedback systems have been implemented to make the feedback scalable, many existing solutions only focus on generating text-based feedback. As is indicated in the multimedia learning principle, learning with more modalities could help utilize more separate channels, reduce the cognitive load and facilitate students' learning. Hence, it is important to explore the potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in feedback generation from and to different modalities. Our study leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) for textual feedback with the supplementary guidance from other modality - relevant lecture slide retrieved from the slides hub. Through an online crowdsourcing study (N=91), this study investigates learning gains and student perceptions using a 2x2 design (i.e., human feedback vs. AI feedback and with vs. without relevant slide), evaluating the clarity, engagement, perceived effectiveness, and reliability) of AI-facilitated multimodal feedback. We observed significant pre-to-post learning gains across all conditions. However, the differences in these gains were not statistically significant between conditions. The post-survey revealed that students found the slide feedback helpful in their learning process, though they reported difficulty in understanding it. Regarding the AI-generated open-ended feedback, students considered it personalized and relevant to their responses, but they expressed lower trust in the AI feedback compared to human-generated feedback.
