Table of Contents
Fetching ...

J-PAS and PFS surveys in the era of dark energy and neutrino mass measurements

Fuxing Qin, Yuting Wang, Gong-Bo Zhao, Antonio J. Cuesta, Jailson Alcaniz, Gabriel Rodrigues, Miguel Aparicio Resco, Antonio Lopez Maroto, Manuel Masip, Jamerson G. Rodrigues, Felipe B. M. dos Santos, Javier de Cruz Perez, Jorge Enrique Garcia-Farieta, Raul Abramo, Narciso Benitez, Silvia Bonoli, Saulo Carneiro, Javier Cenarro, David Cristobal-Hornillos, Renato Dupke, Alessandro Ederoclite, Antonio Hernan-Caballero, Carlos Hernandez-Monteagudo, Carlos Lopez-Sanjuan, Antonio Marin-Franch, Claudia Mendes de Oliveira, Mariano Moles, Laerte Sodre, Keith Taylor, Jesus Varela, Hector Vazquez Ramio

TL;DR

The paper forecasts how joint J-PAS and PFS galaxy surveys, together with Stage-IV CMB measurements from the Simons Observatory and LiteBIRD, can tightly constrain $\sum m_ν$ and the dark-energy equation of state. Using Fisher matrices for both single- and multi-tracer galaxy analyses across a broad redshift range, the authors show that redshift complementarity and cross-tracer synergy significantly reduce parameter degeneracies. In the $Λ$CDM+$\sum m_ν+N_{eff}$ model, the combined data achieve $σ(\sum m_ν)=0.017$ eV, capable of disfavouring the inverted hierarchy at 2.34$\sigma$ if the true mass sum equals the normal-ordering minimum; for a time-varying $w(a)$, the joint data yield $σ(w_0)=0.044$ and $σ(w_a)=0.18$, corresponding to a 5.1$\sigma$ preference for dynamics. Overall, the study demonstrates that J-PAS and PFS will provide competitive, complementary tests of neutrino physics and cosmic acceleration when paired with Stage-IV CMB data.

Abstract

Fisher-matrix forecasts are presented for the cosmological surveys of the Javalambre Physics of the Accelerating Universe Astrophysical Survey (J-PAS) and the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS). The wide, low-redshift coverage of J-PAS and the high-density, high-redshift mapping of PFS are strongly complementary: combining the two reduces marginalized uncertainties on all primary parameters compared with either survey individually. Adding the joint J-PAS+PFS data to next-generation CMB measurements from the Simons Observatory (SO) and \textsc{LiteBird} yields an expected precision of $σ(\sum m_ν)=0.017\,$eV in the $Λ$CDM$+\sum m_ν+N_{\rm eff}$ framework, sufficient to disfavour the inverted neutrino hierarchy at $2.34\,σ$ if the true mass sum equals the normal-ordering minimum. Motivated by recent DESI results, we also forecast within a $w_0w_a$CDM$+\sum m_ν+N_{\rm eff}$ cosmology, adopting the DESI\,DR2 best-fit values ($w_0=-0.758$, $w_a=-0.82$) as fiducial. The combination CMB+J-PAS+PFS then delivers $σ(w_0)=0.044$ and $σ(w_a)=0.18$, corresponding to a $5.1\,σ$ preference for a time-varying dark-energy equation of state. These findings show that J-PAS and PFS, especially when coupled with Stage-IV CMB observations, will provide competitive tests of neutrino physics and the dynamics of cosmic acceleration.

J-PAS and PFS surveys in the era of dark energy and neutrino mass measurements

TL;DR

The paper forecasts how joint J-PAS and PFS galaxy surveys, together with Stage-IV CMB measurements from the Simons Observatory and LiteBIRD, can tightly constrain and the dark-energy equation of state. Using Fisher matrices for both single- and multi-tracer galaxy analyses across a broad redshift range, the authors show that redshift complementarity and cross-tracer synergy significantly reduce parameter degeneracies. In the CDM+ model, the combined data achieve eV, capable of disfavouring the inverted hierarchy at 2.34 if the true mass sum equals the normal-ordering minimum; for a time-varying , the joint data yield and , corresponding to a 5.1 preference for dynamics. Overall, the study demonstrates that J-PAS and PFS will provide competitive, complementary tests of neutrino physics and cosmic acceleration when paired with Stage-IV CMB data.

Abstract

Fisher-matrix forecasts are presented for the cosmological surveys of the Javalambre Physics of the Accelerating Universe Astrophysical Survey (J-PAS) and the Subaru Prime Focus Spectrograph (PFS). The wide, low-redshift coverage of J-PAS and the high-density, high-redshift mapping of PFS are strongly complementary: combining the two reduces marginalized uncertainties on all primary parameters compared with either survey individually. Adding the joint J-PAS+PFS data to next-generation CMB measurements from the Simons Observatory (SO) and \textsc{LiteBird} yields an expected precision of eV in the CDM framework, sufficient to disfavour the inverted neutrino hierarchy at if the true mass sum equals the normal-ordering minimum. Motivated by recent DESI results, we also forecast within a CDM cosmology, adopting the DESI\,DR2 best-fit values (, ) as fiducial. The combination CMB+J-PAS+PFS then delivers and , corresponding to a preference for a time-varying dark-energy equation of state. These findings show that J-PAS and PFS, especially when coupled with Stage-IV CMB observations, will provide competitive tests of neutrino physics and the dynamics of cosmic acceleration.
Paper Structure (16 sections, 31 equations, 11 figures)

This paper contains 16 sections, 31 equations, 11 figures.

Figures (11)

  • Figure 1: Top: Linear cold-plus-baryonic matter power spectrum at $z=0$ for varying $\sum m_\nu$, normalized to the massless case. Middle: Power spectrum for $\sum m_\nu = 0.06$ eV relative to $\sum m_\nu = 0$ at different redshifts. Bottom: Linear growth rate of CDM+baryons at $z=1$ normalized to the massless case.
  • Figure 2: Volume number density of targets in redshift bins. Top: J-PAS (shaded) and PFS (solid line). Bottom: DESI BGS, ELG, LRG, and QSO (shaded).
  • Figure 3: Upper: Fractional uncertainties on cosmological parameters for different data combinations in the $\Lambda$CDM$+\sum m_\nu$ (shaded) and $\Lambda$CDM$+\sum m_\nu+N_\mathrm{eff}$ (hatched) models; Lower: same as the upper figure but for the $w_0w_a$CDM$+\sum m_\nu+N_\mathrm{eff}$ model. For the parameters $w_0$ and $w_a$, the uncertainties $\sigma_{\theta}$ are presented.
  • Figure 4: Marginalized 68% and 95% confidence contours for the $\Lambda$CDM$+\sum m_\nu+N_\mathrm{eff}$ model using J-PAS ELG only (red) and the combination of three tracers (green).
  • Figure 5: Same as Figure \ref{['lcdm_j-pas']}, but for the $w_0w_a$CDM$+\sum m_\nu+N_\mathrm{eff}$ model.
  • ...and 6 more figures